And, also, by the way, just as I said: whether it was semen on her dress or slobber, it was male material. The difference was immaterial to the point. The verdict proves me correct, of course.

You're only demonstrating your dishonesty. And that you can't read.

And, by the way, do you condemn sexual violence against women?

it wasnt, you were lying. LYING.

its hugely material.

verdict on rape:

"NO"

Do you condemn sexual violence against women?

Why do you refuse to condemn it when perpetrated by donald trump? Is it because you agree with him that Blacks are inferior to Whites?

"

I know what the verdict is, you racist moron. It doesn't say that no rape occurred. It only says that Ms. Carroll didn't prove it.

Even a fifth grader would see the difference. Did you advance past the fifth grade?

Did a wall close in on trump this time?

do you? what is it?

A further delightful aspect of this trial is that trump's legal problems are just beginning. And the other stuff is going to be much more serious.

Did a wall close in on trump this time? Was a $5 million punishment a wall?

seems fairly easy to prove it if they had semen on her dress. only you were lying about that.

Do you condemn sexual violence against women?

Why do you refuse to condemn it when perpetrated by donald trump? Is it because you agree with him that Blacks are inferior to Whites?