1. right but i was talking about discrimination against people for their inherent characteristics, like gender, not hairstyle or what kind of shoes they like
  2. You’ll argue anything.
    Richdog likes this.
  3. LOL! You said the "quiet part" out loud!
  4. Jeez! Let me guess: they rented the ballroom for two hours?
  5. "I would rather watch ten women standing around, on the court, doing absolutely nothing, than watching the ultra boring NBA."

    FIFY.
    Richdog, GiantDuckFan and lsu-i-like like this.
  6. Oh, I'm inclined to pardon your snide--but only when you post some excellent spandex-adorned hotties doing what most women do when they want to get noticed. You know, hair & makeup to the max, bodies exposed at the razor edge of indecency; then (when they catch us ogling their bodies) they give us the stinkeye for doing so.

    Pretending blissful ignorance of the fact that they are female and we are male.
    GiantDuckFan, shane0911 and Hou-duco like this.
  7. Let's not forget those Track & Field ladies. Who can forget Michelle Jennecke's warmup in Barcelona?

    Richdog, lsu-i-like and shane0911 like this.
  8. bills like that in the house and senate are cynical political ploys to imagine discrimination where it isnt, and to accuse enemies of discrimination. they are meaningless. again, the issue is the 14th amendment, not these gay laws.

    its like this recent push to legalize inter-racial marriage. it was just to accuse opponents of racism. nevermind that those opponents are already in mixed race-marriages. they are not trying to pass these laws for any purpose other than to accuse their opponents of being deplorable. another example is the recent anti-lynching law. lynching was already very very very illegal.
    GiantDuckFan and shane0911 like this.
  9. So talented.
  10. Not to mention the Aussie accent.
    shane0911 likes this.