Agreed. I think the biggest diff is margin of error. 4-3 has a greater risk of a big offensive play (>5yds?) with greater chance of TFL. 3-4 reduces the big offensive play risk but also the chance of TFL. Basic risk/reward analytics. All other things like indiv skill/talent equal.
OK professor spell check did that it's culpable so what. That's like saying Einstein's theory of relativity is wrong because he spelled theory wrong.
For the heck of it I googled 4-3 defense and as of 2 yrs or so ago, about 1/2 of the nfl teams were running a 4-3 base defense, but since then at least 2 switched to the 3-4 and with @ least 1 team switching to a 4-3. The teams running the 4-3 spend a lot of time in nickel & dime packages for obvious passing downs and when going against pass happy teams. I think it comes down to the personnel you have on hand. Pick the scheme to maximize their talents as opposed to forcing them into a coaches preferred scheme. — like we did last year.
Agreed. My baseline goes out the window with NFL level talent that are handpicked/ developed for specific proven talents/ strengths at the highest level.
