1. Moves. Video shows it clearer. But with the rules they call it whatever they want.

    I'm so tired of the catch/no catch interpretation. Nfl was supposed to make it simple again minus the stupid football move shit. But they didnt. We don't need to be able to explain what a catch is we know when we see it.

    That's gotta be a catch. But likely isn't.
  2. Zebra said it was, then it was.
  3. Ya but you're splitting hairs. You're intelligent enough to know what he meant. We threw zero interceptions against a defense that made a huge name for itself last year in forcing turnovers.

    Edit: I'll just avoid it.
  4. But another zebra in the booth COACH have overturned the call. You never know. We got the TD anyway so all's well that ends well.
    shane0911 and GregLSU like this.
  5. he dropped it just before hitting the ground
  6. That's a copout bc you know better. They overturn every catch nowadays. I don't like giving Oeaux credit but he gets it here.
    Bengal B, shane0911 and GregLSU like this.
  7. Of course but I still see nothing in the limited angle we have that says it was dropped. See him with both hands on the ball and he puts the ball on the ground followed by his body.

    I get your point, the booth loves to stick it to us, I see a catch
  8. yep.
    there is even actual wording in the rule that if there is any question about it, then “no catch”

    meaning receiver doesn’t get benefit of the doubt.
    TigerTap likes this.
  9. Yes, next time pick a place that isnt hidden
  10. PP7's INT at Bama was much clearer, and that was negated.
    ParadiseiNC, Bengal B and shane0911 like this.