WMD honcho reportedly quitting

ys he is leaving for family obligations, but experts feel it is because he has been unable to locate WMD in Iraq and is very frustrated.

Thought you political debaters (right wingers and left wingers) would like to fight about this awhile.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/12/19/sprj.irq.kay.reut/index.html

 

I think Saddam had them. He used them in the past and never provided any evidence he destroyed them.

The delay in finding them just means it wasn't as easy as some people were saying before the war, and Hans Blix is still a chump but not as much of a chump as we think.

 

Let's face reality: if no poisonous gas was found in warheads, in missiles on launchers ready to be fired on the battlefield, then Saddam never had them.

The supposed "hunt" for WMD was just more PR spin by the Bush liars. They just hope this goes away quietly and the American people forget all the lies Bush told on why he was conquering Iraq.

Having said that, I am surprised that no WMD were found in Iraq. I figured Bush would "find" them, whether Saddam had them or not.

It will probably be left for the historians to discover, but I strongly suspect Bush knew Saddam had no weaponized WMD before he invaded. There is no way I think he would have risked having ten thousand or more American corpses.

He knew Saddam had no military to fight back with and no WMD, and he knew Iraq was easy pickings. He attacked not because Saddam was a threat, but because he knew he was basically defenseless.

The only thing we are waiting for now is finding out the real reason Bush took over Iraq. We do not know that yet.

 

Idiot.

 

Ditto

:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

 

hey cottonbowl66 has some legitimate points and we should respond. hahahaha just kidding.

 

You going to give me more quotes from UN resolutions, then deny that you care what the UN thinks again? You going to tell me the UN justifies Bush's War, then deny you are using the UN as a justification for it again?

I have read all the idiocy I need to read from you.

You talk out of your mouth and ass at the same time and make no sense from either.

 

At least we USE our mouth.

 

for the hundredth time, those quotes were from the mouth of bush, not the UN. they were from the bush speech to the UN. there is a difference between a speaker and the audience. if i quote the speaker, that doesnt mean i am quoting the audience. get it?

man, i am talented, with so many orifices capable of talking.