No it doesn't. http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2014/311/580/2014-311580204-0c3ee98d-9.pdf - 2014 http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2013/311/580/2013-311580204-0c43423c-9A.pdf - 2013 http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2012/311/580/2012-311580204-09d3e966-9.pdf - 2012 http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2011/311/580/2011-311580204-08d3f620-9.pdf - 2011 http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2010/311/580/2010-311580204-07ca817f-9.pdf - 2010
In 2014 5.7% of Donations to the Clinton Foundation went to charitable organizations. The rest went to........ People in the Clinton Foundation...
And still, she could have avoided it. Incorrect. The DNA actually proved to be his and she knew that. What she did was suppress the evidence based on the destruction of the underpants prior to the trial. Yes, he was. Go back and listen to her comments and you will hear her acknowledge that. Hint: it's the part where she talks about the lie detector. Nobody is saying she wasn't successful in doing her job. What people are saying is that for a woman, a mother....to defend a man of child rape when she KNEW he was guilty is reprehensible, disgusting, and against everything she claims to be.
You obviously don't know how to read financial statements or tax returns, nor understand how charity works. The Foundation spends 89% of the money it receives on wages to doctors and other medical professionals, medicines, medical supplies, and medical equipment, all for direct service to poor people who otherwise couldn't get any of that. And the world's two biggest and most respected charity monitoring organizations give the Foundation their highest rating. If our Lady of the Lake Hospital gave all of its medical services and medicines away for free to poor people would you tell the same lie about them?
Because those countries have an abysmal human rights record and an established standard of mistreating/discriminating against women. Libs started the conversation about a war on women but Hillary is at the front of the platoon. And you have to be totally daft and/or ignorant to still believe that SA wasn't behind 9/11.
Do you know what the section for grants and aid is for? None of what you are talking about is in reference to that. I have provided links to the returns, you have provided hot air.
So, it's your contention that taking somebody's money means you agree with their causes? Or that you aid in their abuses? So, OJ Simpson abused the Goldman and Brown families... he shouldn't have had to pay any money to them? Money is restitution. If someone is abusing me I'd gladly take their money to help restore me. Short of waging war against Saudi Arabia, which no sane person wants, taking their money to help people is the BEST thing we can do. I asked for a reply that made sense. You didn't provide one.
The Clinton Foundation is not a pass-through organization like the United Way. The Foundation, itself, is the institution that provides doctor services and medicines.... the aid is in the form of treatment. You make no sense.
