according to fox sports. http://www.foxsports.com/content/view?contentId=2300556 Notice that they felt like they had to include the USC / Wash St. game to try to give USC creditability with their soft ass schedule.
SEC is involved in more big games than anyone else. SEC LSU = 3 UGA = 3 UF = 3 AUB = 1 UT = 1 Everyone Else Oklahoma = 2 Texas = 1 Florida State = 1 Miami = 1 Michigan = 1 Ohio State = 1 Kansas St = 1 USC = 1 Wash. St. = 1
The USC JUGGERnut Trivia question: Who has the best overall and conference record in PAC-10 FB over the past three years? :lol: not who you think ... Washington State 19-4, 29-8 leads USC 19-5, 29-9 Answer: Just another reason to send USC to another Rose Bowl. :hihi: These cupcake beating fools always choke on one of their cupcakes every year ... 2004 will be no different ... they can always proclaim themselves NC anyway :wink:
Well, I don't know if it is just a rumor, but the BCS is reported to do away with Strength of Schedule and Quality Wins... WTF??? USC should be undisputed champs for years to come with those kind of rules I would love to have a home and home with them... PLEASE...
Mark May is much worse, IMO. Michigan State as NC in 2002? Auburn as NC in 2003? I mean, Auburn had a hell of a team but with JC at QB....I just dont ever see them winning the NC....maybe the SEC if they get their offensive system running.
