No she hasn't. Have you even watched her PBS interview? She is asked about it and she denies that she did anything that was pointed at the Trump campaign but that during incidental surveillance members of his campaign were swept up. Rep. Devin Nunes even said that the unmasking was conducted in situations of incidental surveillance. There is absolutely nothing dishonest about her statement and she has been very consistent all along.
"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is 'not done' to say it, just as in mid-Victorian times it was 'not done' to mention trousers in the presence of a lady. Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness. A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing, either in the popular press or in the highbrow periodicals."
evidently the FBI thinks there is something to it because they are investigating. i don't think they are the liberal den that you suspect is driving this scandal
so you're playing the boxer and the referee,.. oh, and those two people are on the investigation committee, their opinion is more educated than your's. Trump’s new tack on the Russia scandal may already be backfiring https://newrepublic.com/minutes/141850/trumps-new-tack-russia-scandal-may-already-backfiring ....Rice’s argument, in other words, is that she requested that Trump campaign officials be unmasked not for political reasons but because intelligence reports suggested they may have been doing something illegal. The Trump White House and the right have been giddy ever since it became clear that Rice was behind the unmasking—though there is nothing that ties her to the leaking of classified information. It increasingly looks like Trump campaign officials were unmasked not because of who they were but because of what they were suspected of doing.....
http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/03/s...roduce-detailed-spreadsheets-involving-trump/ Speaking of speculation. 2015 was the year.