https://www.wsj.com/articles/susan-...p-associates-for-political-reasons-1491331871 You know, it is even reported here that there were conversations unmasked that weren't involved with Russia. Even extends past Rice.
You do not want proof. Further, this is your only out. This is all you got. To say prove it when you know that we are not involved in the investigation and cannot, therefore, provide you with proof. Not because proof does not exist but because we are not currently privy to it, nor are you. Further the investigative bodies would be foolish to publish their proof before they bring their case to the grand jury or public when the investigation is completed. It takes a fool to not look at this and understand that there is smoke billowing out of the white house right now. Further indication should be that, almost daily, Trump offers some new "evidence" that the whole investigation is illegitimate. For someone with nothing to hide, he sure does want this to go away......right now. Even Winston can see the writing on the wall as do other conservatives. The fact that you cannot, and refuse to acknowledge it unless blaming it on Clinton or Obama, tells the whole story. You are a true believer.
so what. you think that conversations between people has to stay on one subject alone? hardly. the article wouldn't open for me but the bi-line even says that Mrs. Rice denies that she did anything political. Let her testify before the House Intel Committee.
SO you believe her but not Trump. Trump said he didn't collude. Why dont you believe him but you believe her? Here is a hint, its "political".
Maybe it's because it's been proved time and time again he is a liar and a buffoon? Could be the reason.
More fallacies. Just admit you were a fool about the HRC issue and I will admit the same. I point to HRC to remind you how foolish you were. You restate it as me "blaming her". You can't even hold an intellectual conversation without misconstruing the words I actually say. There was actual evidence found in that case you and you defended it and ignored it daily. All I have done is challenge the "speculative reports", that is all they are as YOU HAVE CONFIRMED and you call me a fool. We have proof of extreme lintel surveillance by the NSA, CIA, etc and you just assume RUSSIA? Russia was only an issue to you after HRC lost. There were ZERO threads about Russia until Trump won. Just like zero stories on CNN until Trump won. You talk about smoke.... Again, why would the leaker ONLY LEAK NAMES? Clearly they read the report. In the wikileaks, we got all the content. Why would a Dem operative choose to hide the details of the conversation? If it was SOOOO damning Trump was talking with Russia?
