Pollack Over-Under

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by DValley, Sep 17, 2003.

  1. DValley

    DValley Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    1
    Okay, I've heard enough talk about how pollack is overrated and then the other hand that he is the greatest. I think he's a good player week in and week out. I wish he was a tiger. Well anyway, lets put this into numbers for this game.

    Over or Under

    Sacks 2

    Tackles 7

    And just for laughs,

    Whitworth/Reed steppping on his facemask after pancaking him 6
     
  2. dawg_o_rama

    dawg_o_rama Freshman

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    LMAO, Good thread...

    I'll say under on all 3...I'd also like to put in my own new category:

    Over/Under

    # of times he takes a play "off" 1

    I'll take under.
     
  3. SouthLink02

    SouthLink02 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    1,472
    Likes Received:
    4
    Even if the guy has no sacks, his important could be immense. Last week is proof enough of that.
     
  4. MobileBengal

    MobileBengal Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    884
    Im taking under on both, as well, but I dont think his numbers will equate to his performance.
     
  5. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Utilizing that criteria, ULL's Delesdernier ought to be 1st team All America:


    UL-Lafayette vs South Carolina (Aug 30, 2003 at Columbia, SC)

    SACKS (UA-A): UL-Lafayette-Delesdernier, M 2-0. South
    Carolina-Lawrence, Marcus 1-0.
     
  6. SpringTiger

    SpringTiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,261
    Likes Received:
    12
    I'll go with the under on all three.

    How about passes batted down - o/u 1.5?

    How about TFL - o/u 1.5?

    I'll take over on both and hope like hell that I'm wrong!

    LSU 13
    UGA 10
    :geaux: :geaux: :geaux: :geaux:
     
  7. SouthLink02

    SouthLink02 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    1,472
    Likes Received:
    4
    What criteria? He had no sacks last week and very little back-tackles but he forced an INT and interrupted MANY, MANY plays. Just because someone doesnt have a sack or tackle doesnt mean he wasnt important. Thats my point.
     
  8. MobileBengal

    MobileBengal Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    884
    I'll take the over on both of those, as well.
     
  9. LSUHotdog

    LSUHotdog Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2002
    Messages:
    834
    Likes Received:
    9
    Personally I think Pollack is a great DE. But I think the caliber OL that he will face will be at his level. He will win some,a nd he will lose some. But it will come down to if we allow him to make a big play. I don't think that he is going to run all over us. Just don't be surprised if Addai runs the ball to the strong side or middle more. Hey you people forget, we handily beat Florida last year, who beat Georgia, so don't be so quick Georgia fans to underestimate us.
    I love our chances this year because we are flying under the radar out of the national spotlight, so I think we are a real sleeper. You guys don't know how good our freshman safeties are either.
     
  10. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    That is an excellent point and one the GA fans need to understand. HE WILL WIN SOME AND HE WILL LOSE SOME. Even the greatest players don't win every battle. Pollack will not set up shop in LSU's backfield and demonize our entire offense every step of the way as some of you pontificate. He's a concern for our defense and one Saban will address in his game plan. But, for crying out loud. How dominating can he be when you consistently defend him with "he may not have had a sack, but..." ??
    OK my last word on the subject.
     

Share This Page