Obama: Sure, I'll meet with Castro, Chavez, Ahmadinejad, etc

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by JoeReckless, May 22, 2008.

  1. JoeReckless

    JoeReckless Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    59
    [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSFSUbMWenU[/media]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. CajunlostinCali

    CajunlostinCali Booger Eatin Moron

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    13,180
    Likes Received:
    8,283
    I don't get it. You have Ronald Regan standing proudly over a nation in your avatar. The clip you provided uses Regan as an example in supporting his stated position. With the question posed in the clip, are you split on your support for both Regan and Obama?
     
  3. JoeReckless

    JoeReckless Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    59
    Did you listen to the question? "Without precondition"?

    It sounds like you, nor Obama have any idea how Reagan defeated the Soviet Union.

    If Obama gets nominated, he will lose as bad as Mondale and Dukakis. He has so many flaws, it is unreal.
     
  4. CajunlostinCali

    CajunlostinCali Booger Eatin Moron

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    13,180
    Likes Received:
    8,283
    What precondition did Regan use to speak to the Russians? I am not defending Obama but I do understand the question. I just don't recall any preconditions on Regans part to communicate with the Bears. Gorbachev taking the helm only made talks easier for Regan.
    My comment favored neither. Frankly I have not heard Obama explain the "then what" scenario if negotations fail. We have already spent many years negotationing with Iran, through multi-party negotations, the UN, etc. How would Obama do things differently?
    Although I will vote, there is not one candidate currently for consideration I would cast a vote on. Once again I will write in my vote and it just may be you! At this point you are pinned in third behind Zack de la Rocha and Ted Nugent. :thumb:
     
  5. luvdimtigers

    luvdimtigers Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,574
    Likes Received:
    308
    Just how did Reagan defeat the Soviet Union? Let me guess, by goading them into an arms race and bankrupting them, right?

    The Soviet Union was already teetering on the verge of collapse, from corruption within, and the fact that communisim is unrealistic, and always doomed to fail or starve it's people (see Cuba) Ronald Reagan's arms build up didn't help them any, but make no mistake, the old Soviet Union was going down anyway.

    You really need to quit listening to the revisionist historians, Hannity, Rush (the biggest hypocrite in the world) Limabaugh and Fox (fair and balanced my ass) News.
     
  6. USMTiger

    USMTiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2003
    Messages:
    1,668
    Likes Received:
    167
    I love and admire Reagan. However, please remember that not only did he speak to them, but he SOLD FREAKING WEAPONS TO IRAN
     
  7. JoeReckless

    JoeReckless Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    59
    The Iran-Contra affair was a political scandal which was revealed in 1986 as a result of earlier events during the Reagan administration. It began as an operation to increase U.S.-Iranian relations, wherein Israel would ship weapons to a moderate, politically influential group of Iranians opposed to the Ayatollah Khomeni; the U.S. would reimburse Israel with those weapons and receive payment from Israel. The moderate Iranians agreed to do everything in their power to achieve the release of six U.S. hostages, who were being held by Hezbollah. The plan eventually deteriorated into an arms-for-hostages scheme, in which members of the executive branch sold weapons to Iran in exchange for the release of the American hostages, without the direct authorization of President Ronald Reagan. Large modifications to the plan were conjured by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council in late 1985. In North's plan, a portion of the proceeds from the weapon sales was diverted to fund anti-Sandinista and anti-communist rebels, or Contras, in Nicaragua. While President Ronald Reagan was a supporter of the Contra cause,[4] he did not authorize this plan, nor was he aware that the funds were being sent to the Contras.

    After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Ronald Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages. The investigation was compounded when large volumes of documents relating to the scandal were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials. On March 4, 1987, Reagan returned to the airwaves in a nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for any actions that he was unaware of, and admitting that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages."

    Many investigations ensued, including those by the United States Congress and the three-man, Reagan-appointed "Tower Commission". Neither could find any evidence that Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs. In the end, fourteen administration officials were charged with crimes, and eleven convicted, including Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger. They were all pardoned in the final days of the George H. W. Bush presidency, who had been vice-president at the time.

    Iran-Contra affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
  8. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    you've seem to have dug yourself into a hole here Joe, It will be interesting to see you climb out of this one.

    Kennedy did the same thing
    Nixon as well
    Ronny as everyone else has pointed out here.
    Oh yea and Bush too:thumb:
     
  9. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    The Soviet Union was a mess and was certainly teetering on the edge and had been for a decade. But Reagan pushed them right over, that's not a revisionist history.

    But we were also teetering on the brink of a global thermonuclear war for decades and the US did meet with the Soviets many times during the Cold War under several administrations and signed a number of important treaties that defended us without the need to lob warheads.

    "Speak softly . . . and carry a big stick", Teddy Roosevelt said. We have always been more effective when we can do BOTH than when we can only do one or the other.
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Exactly. From the horses mouth. He was responsible and in charge, therefore culpable for trading arms for hostages.
     

Share This Page