Obama giving away more money! When will it stop!

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by cajun_tiger, Sep 29, 2009.

Page 1 of 2
  1. cajun_tiger

    cajun_tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    11
    cajun_tiger, Sep 29, 2009
    #1
  2. BamaBengalTiger

    BamaBengalTiger Geaux Tigers !!!!!

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    80
    "the grants were part of a larger $2.5 million economic support program intended to promote democracy and women’s economic opportunities in Libya, which Congress appropriated for fiscal year 2009. "

    It is not just Obama. This was appropriated by congress, probably before he took office. Just sayin. Its time to clean house.
     
    BamaBengalTiger, Sep 29, 2009
    #2
  3. Rex_B

    Rex_B Geaux Time

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    187
    Once again you are worrying about 400,000.

    GRAB THE BIGGER PICTURE OF THESE MORONS SPENDING BILLIONS ON BAILOUTS AND ON FOREIGN POLICY.
     
    Rex_B, Sep 29, 2009
    #3
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    So, we have this republican representative Mark Kirk, see, who wants to be the next GOP presidential candidate. He making waves about ACORN, Iran, and anything else he can to get into the news and get some name recognition going. He's already misfired by starting a witch for groups that supported ACORN, like the Service Employees Union, who also happen to support a number of unhappy Republican politicians.

    Nows he's loudly blaming Obama for a tiny line item in a Congressional appropriation that he was a part of . . . and Obama wasn't. :lol:
     
    red55, Sep 29, 2009
    #4
  5. cajun_tiger

    cajun_tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    11
    Its more than 400,000......and even if i were just 400K its 400k thats going towards a family that celebrates terrorism and the death of americans and a known funder of terrorism. Yes lets have another major attack on america so our nation can go more in to debt. Right now the terrorist groups are laughing about how stupid the Obama administration is for giving them money in there efforts to kill americans. Obama is funding american deaths juuuuust great.

    I'm sorry i'm not going to ignore Obama giving money to terrorist supporters. I don't care if its 5 cents or 5 billion. Its our tax dollars.

    Obama not only enjoys funding to kill babies but also funds the death of innocent americans. So this is the CHANGE everyone was talking about?
     
    cajun_tiger, Sep 29, 2009
    #5
  6. cajun_tiger

    cajun_tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    11
    Yeah one moron that comes to mind is Obama him self.
     
    cajun_tiger, Sep 29, 2009
    #6
  7. Rex_B

    Rex_B Geaux Time

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    187
    Maybe tinsley can talk some sense into you. .haha
     
    Rex_B, Sep 29, 2009
    #7
  8. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    An exchange between geniuses. :grin:
     
    red55, Sep 29, 2009
    #8
  9. cajun_tiger

    cajun_tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    11
    It sucks when the facts are staring you in the face, know matter what you say will make you right, you support a president that gives money to terrorist supporters and you agree with a president that also helps kill babies.

    His day of judgement will come and it wont be a good one.
     
    cajun_tiger, Sep 29, 2009
    #9
  10. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    What's wrong, the National Enquirer didn't carry the story?

    Here's a fact you overlooked in the "article" (I used parenthesis because the word 'article' suggests something credible which is something that isn't usually associated with the website you linked) to which you posted a link.

     
    MLUTiger, Sep 29, 2009
    #10
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page