North Korea agrees to end Nuclear program

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by islstl, Sep 19, 2005.

  1. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    46,115
    Likes Received:
    9,705
    the 6 nation talks did indeed do it's intended job thanks in great part to the Bush Administration

    remember all those naysayers who wanted one on one talks between the US and North Korea?....and all those saying we were not putting enough emphasis on the North Korean situation when we first embarked on our liberation of Iraq and that the Bush Admin couldn't handle both situations simultaneously?

    Democrats.....what silly people
     
  2. locoguano

    locoguano Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2004
    Messages:
    10,342
    Likes Received:
    2,216
    Yeah.. the day that NK really ends their nuke program is the day that a Hamas member wears a yamika...
     
  3. NoLimitMD

    NoLimitMD Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,551
    Likes Received:
    366
    Glad to see this resolved for now. Good work by all parties (not political ones) involved.
     
  4. burlesontiger

    burlesontiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    907
    Likes Received:
    75
    North Korea is facing mass starvation this winter. They need food, and need it now. All bets are off in the spring, I predict.
     
  5. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    North Korea has agreed to this before. Talk is cheap. They are likely stalling for time and trying to placate China to get immediate relief. next year may be a different matter. The North Koreans cannot be trusted.

    When the UN inspectors go back in and account for every gram of enriched uranium and plutonium, then I might believe it.
     
  6. NoLimitMD

    NoLimitMD Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,551
    Likes Received:
    366
    No doubt about it. This is still an encouraging first step, IMO. And I don't put too much weight in treaties with dishonorable or primitive countries.
     
  7. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Why? You didn't believe them when they said there were WMDs in Iraq.

    Yamulke
     
  8. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Sure I did, when they said that in 1991. They then spent 10 years destroying WMD's.

    I also believed them in 2002 when they said that the WMD's had been destroyed. Most of the UNSCOM inspectors were British and American and our own chief inspector Scott Ritter warned us that no further WMD's would be found. That warning may have been disbelieved by you, but not by me.

    North Korea agreed to abandon weapons production in the 90's and UN inspectors sealed all of the fissile materials for several years. Then the North Koreans unilaterally broke that agreement, broke the UN seals and restarted weapons manufacture. While the inspectors were there, no weapons were produced. Any agreement that doesn't include on-site inspection will not hold water.

    Even then the North Koreans are likely to break it the next time they want some attention. The only way to end this cycle is to remove all fissile materials from Korea . . . and they will fight before they let that happen.
     
  9. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Saddam's refusal to cooperate with UN inspections played a large part in the decision to take him out.
     
  10. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    yarmulke.
     

Share This Page