a little misleading, they just wont be the anchors for election coverage, that will be David Gregory from now on, they will be contributors.
MSNBC tried to put its most popular political commentators into the anchor spot and it didn't work out. But they were NOT fired, just back to their regular shows.
They are still tools. They got removed from election anchoring because of their "biased coverage" on MSNBC. :rolleye33: Isn't that like pulling over Snoop's bus and discovering that two guys are smoking weed? :huh:
I think the most interesting part of this article is where they talk about the ratings. Fox News had nearly 4x the viewers as MSNBC for the last 2 night of the RNC and also had more viewers for the DNC?! I know that Fox News leans right and MSNBC leans left, but can that simply be explained as more republicans watching cable news than democrats?
Oprah had Obama on but will not have Palin on, unless she wins. What a joke this whole mess has become. Way to geaux O, you are officially a bigger bitch then ever. Sides one O= both Mathews and Olbermann combined, right? http://newsblaze.com/story/20080907133448reye.nb/topstory.html
Harpo should have both Biden and Palin on to ask them the same questions, fairly. Otherwise, she should have stayed out of the political arena in the first place.
good. both of those guys are childish idiots. Now if only NBC would stop putting Olbermann sunday night football.
She has not, or will not have Palin at all unless she wins. With this election I am part of the bottom middle but the theme here is the fairness of the media being impartial to both sides. It is certain that both MSNBC and Oprah have not done this. Perhaps the position taken here by MSNBC will be an example to others of what not to do when all you work for are ratings. Having Michael Moore on will not help that cause.
