More LSU disrespect in Lee Corso Mail this week

here is Lee's answer to this question:



Question 10: Lee, do you agree that the balance of power in the SEC has shifted to the West?
David Humphries, Lake Charles, LA
Well, not so fast, my friend, not so fast. It’s early season. I know LSU beat Georgia but that’s one of the few. Let’s wait and see a couple more of these matchups as they go along. I think it’s pretty balanced. It looks like the best football team in the league MIGHT be Arkansas right now, although Auburn’s playing very well, and then LSU. I know they’re all in the West, but that Georgia should have beaten LSU, the game I saw. There’s no question. LSU was not as good a football team as Georgia, but they beat them because of Georgia’s missed field goals and the whole crowd at Baton Rouge. So it’s too early to tell

jackass!

 

it is still a W in the win column. I will take it all day long... flying under the radar.....

 

:cry: :cry: :cry:

 

We need to stop freaking out about every single view on LSU right now.Winning the SEC has nothing to do with what someone from ESPN says...More times than not, ESPN is dead wrong. But we are still young into the season and we probably should stop freaking out every single time someone says something to the tune of "lsu isn't as good as they think." If this is the NC year, nothing Lee Coro says is goign to change that. Having said that...I agree, A win is a win. I don't care if you win by one point on a pass interference call, you still won the game....But lets calm down about all this media talk recently...

 

Yes, I will be here, win or lose, rain or shine...

And honestly, it's going to be one of the best games in the SEC all year...really looking forward to it.

 

I see where people bring up "Well if UGA makes those 3 FG's they would be in the lead. Not so fast my friend, had UGA made those FG's then the play calling by LSU would have altered. The playcalling is different when you are tied or losing than when you are hanging on to a lead. If LSU had been trailing due to those FG's you would have seen more agressive playcalling.

 

What is the link for this? The link I found doesn't have this question or answer...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/columns/story?columnist=corso_lee&id=1633337

That's dated 10/8/2003.

 

I am so tired of that noise. "What ifs" DON'T COUNT.
What if our entire fleet was in Pearl Harbor in December 7th?
What if voters in Palm Beach knew how to read a voting ballot?
What if I had the winning Powerball numbers?
What if ALL the missed field goals in the LSU/UGA game were made? WHO CARES!!!! None of that happed!!!
The Allied Forces won WWII not the Axis powers;
George W. Bush is President, not Albicore;
I don't have $80 Million and;
LSU won 17-10 instead of 20-19!

Yeah, that's right, 20-19! If you want to play what if, then you need to do it both ways. If you give them their 3 missed field goals, then you have to give us our missed field goal too, and then the final score is 20-19, LSU!

 

Thank you, I feel the same way. It's so easy to say, "well, if he made those three field goals.... ". First of all, that's a HUGE difference from missing all three to making all three. If he had missed any of those three, they still lose. Secondly, I don't know where people get off thinking LSU would have set back and done nothing if they were losing in that game.

 

go to :

www.collegefootballgameday.com

then go to the "ask corso" deal