Believe it or not but these guys have more of a claim to the National Title game than USC. They have all played ranked teams, beaten BCS conference teams and two of them would probably beat USC head to head. The Pac-10 is weaker than the WAC, the MAC, AND Mountain West this year. Boise St and Miami would shoot out well with USC. These guys have had very respectable years.
I agree completely. But most here were talking about how these types of schools don't even deserve to be ranked or get all the attention they got all year. I do remember that thread that was asking if we should boycott a BCS bowl game against TCU (had they made it). For some reason, at that time, fans here would have rathered played a BCS team with 4 losses, instead of an undefeated non BCS team. Anyway, enough of that rant. I agree, SC didn't play anyone this year with a strong football program. It is not that hard to play good D in the PAC 10 since they throw the ball constantly. SC is a good football team, but not better than a 1 loss SEC team.
I'm not sure what you are smoking, but the USC bashing is going a little to far with this one... USC would smoke all three of those teams most likely. TCU has played one of the biggets patsy schedules in the nation, Boise St. had a great year, but don't have the talent to run with USC, and the same can be said about Miami(Ohio). I'm sorry, but unless I am completely misreading this, this is ludicrous. No way in hell any of those three teams would beat USC....
