1. Looks like I'm in the minority. I'd put it on the Dawgs. Just haven't seen enough consistency from the Tigers. If we don't see any improvement in our O & D lines Saturday it could be ugly.
  2. If you forced me (cuz I don't gamble), I would take Georgia, sadly. A young QB in a hostile environment on the road. His first true test of SEC road play and it's in a place where we haven't won in over 20 years.
  3. I would go with Georgia.
  4. I'm pretty sure that's not what he meant.
  5. each of their 3 wins have been close.
  6. yes


    9/12 South Carolina W 41-37
    9/19 @ Arkansas W 52-41
    9/26 Arizona State W 20-17

    They have looked bad offensively in 2 of their 4 games (Okla State and Arizona State, not exactly defensive juggernauts).

    They have looked badly defensively in 3 of their 4 games (Okla State, USCe, Arkansas). No way you give up 37 to USCe and probably not 41 to a still young Arkansas offense.

    So if you wanna talk about a team trying to find an identity, Georgia is in a worse position than LSU in that regard.
  7. no kidding. tons of noise about getting rid of DC here. i think its a bit unfair because theyre looking back to when van gorder was DC in the first part of the decade. uga had many nfl hosses on those Ds---not anymore. and SEC offenses have just gotten better. its unreasonable to think your D is going to avg 13 pts/game like the great ones did 5 yrs ago.
  8. I'll take the gun from bitch slap him a few times then put my money down on LSU.

    LSU 38
    Ga 17

    :geaux:
  9. If by "tight game" you mean last second field goal...then yes.;)
  10. I'm taking LSU.

    It's time to see that "Damn Strong Football team".


    :crystal::geaux::crystal::geaux::crystal: