Seriously, when the words PROTECT OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES are forbidden by the Bush party, why shouldn't we be scared that an elected Bush with nothing to lose in a second term tramples all over those liberties? The Last Straw Carl F. Worden http://www.sierratimes.com/04/10/20/carlworden.htm
Rex is doing his part to "get into the mindset of a minority"...He comes here knowing no one reads or cares other than to antagonize him, so some might call him a glutton for punishment... I just call him what he is...the infected, ingrown hair on www.tigerforums.com 's @ss....Someone should just bite the bullet and pull it out, and do away with him permanently...He's a plagarist, a charlatan, and he espouses an opinion no one here cares about, for, or even raises an eyebrow to. The problem is that he is an antagonist...No one here will change their vote that will respond to what they view as his divergent opinion. Yet he continues to post, as is his privilege unless moderators or owners think otherwise... I do not know why he does...Nor do I want him to explain it to me...Pests-like buzzing flies over a carrion carcas-are best left to be ignored.
Funny... TigerEducated got his ass handed to him when he tried to propagate that smear about plagiarism.... I posted the essay in question; it's still here on this site, and I challenge anybody to find it anywhere on the net other than by my hand. So, having been thoroughly debunked, he wants to excise me from this site altogether, so that I won't be around to remind people of his propensity to lie. TigerEducated, I had no idea this site exists only to promote Republican propaganda. If so, I confess to missing it in the terms of agreement. It's just as I said earlier in this thread. Republicans on boards like these can't win the debates, so they don't address the issues but focus instead on cutting out the opposing voice. Failing that, they resort to childish namecalling. I never expected you, TigerEducated, to agree with the opinions I espouse. You see, I'm fully cognizant of the fact that I have ethics you lack.
besides being crazy wrong about bush, and unfairly stereotyping republicans, and, most importantly, not quite understanding why war is necessary, i generally agree with rex.
martin, I'm not the guy who found the paper in the first place or called him on it. I think the guy's name on the Lair is LSUMJ...Though I cannot be sure... I have merely said that I would submit both of them, and he bucked at that. He would not let his own work stand on its own. He has still refused to do that. Funny that he didn't save both of them, but for some reason saved that one, even though later on he magically reproduced it... The bottom line is that this guy is here for no other reason to antagonize. He doesn't change anyone's mind, nor their opinion. He's a tree falling in the forest...If you're not there, no one hears it. NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU SAY. IT WILL NOT MAKE THEM THINK DIFFERENTLY. YOU ARE HERE TO ANTAGONIZE. YOU SERVE NO PURPOSE WITH YOUR PRESENCE HERE. YOU HAVE RUN AT LEAST TWO INDIVIDUALS THAT I KNOW THAT FORMERLY READ THIS PART OF THE SITE OFF. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU COST TWO POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTORS TO THE SITE AWAY. THEY WERE GOING TO PAY MONEY TO DONATE TO THIS SITE TO KEEP IT RUNNING. YOU AND YOUR BEHAVIOR-NIGH, YOUR VERY PRESENCE-COST THIS SITE THAT MONEY. STAND PROUD.
i was only gonna give the minimum, but because rex is here it convinced me to make the hall of fame by donating 50$. maybe that makes up for the 2 he chased away. besides, those guys were chumps, they coulda just ignored the dude.
