Lawyer found guilty of aiding terrorism

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUDeek, Feb 11, 2005.

  1. LSUDeek

    LSUDeek All That She Wants...

    From http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050211/ZNYT02/502110443
    This is an example of how liberalism is a disease, and how the left thinks that attacking America is part of their civil rights.
     
  2. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    My recommend punishment would be very, very painful. Bamboo and fire would be involved.
     
  3. G_MAN113

    G_MAN113 Founding Member

    Liberals have so blurred the line between right and wrong in this country, that what was once considered seditious and/or treasonable activity is now protected under the guise of "civil liberties". In essence, there is no clear-cut definition of treason anymore.

    This woman should consider herself lucky to be looking at 30 years (at 65, in effect, a life sentence)...50 years ago, she would have faced the electric chair.
     
  4. CParso

    CParso Founding Member

    This crap sickens me.
     
  5. tigerlaw

    tigerlaw Founding Member

  6. LSUGradin99

    LSUGradin99 I Bleedeth Purple 'N Gold

    You people that label the actions of every misguided idiot as the acts of a liberal are sickening. I can't believe how socially brainwashed some of you are. Come on, do you see everything in terms of liberal or conservative? Are you not able to rationalize about each and every situation and come up with your own viewpoint on it?

    By the way, thank you tigerlaw for having the ability to do what others seemingly can not.
     
  7. tiger fan 2001

    tiger fan 2001 Founding Member

    I cannot believe that the way women are oppressed in Islam and she has the opportunity to get a degree that she would even think about supportting these people. She should be tried for treason or terrorism and then made to live with that wack couple from Fla. that torchered those kids. She should also be flogged daily or taken to a soccer field and shot. :911:
     
  8. MarineTiger

    MarineTiger Founding Member

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  9. LSUDeek

    LSUDeek All That She Wants...

    What did I need to rationalize about? The woman believed that allowing her defendant to *ILLEGALLY* communicate with his terrorist brethren was part of her civil rights.

    People who rationalize anti-American behavior as being "part of their civil rights" are liberal.

    Others can, they just agree with me and are right, unlike you.
     
  10. LSUDeek

    LSUDeek All That She Wants...

    And by the way, GradIn99, I see that even though you don't care for the reputation system, I see you used your massive clout obtained through it to give me a whole bunch of red for a post you disagreed with. What a hypocrite.
     

Share This Page