I've seen all I have to see with Mettenberger

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by islstl, Sep 10, 2011.

  1. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    46,115
    Likes Received:
    9,705
    Carry on. :thumb:
     
  2. bhelmLSU

    bhelmLSU Founding Member Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    You are talking about the medical hardship waiver rule (medical redshirt) and I would agree. I was mentioning the rule for redshirts without injury.
     
  3. onceanlsufan

    onceanlsufan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,661
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    +1
     
  4. TwistedTiger

    TwistedTiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    14,073
    Likes Received:
    4,977
    I'm pretty sure they were always called medical, they just use some nick or bruise as an excuse.
     
  5. bhelmLSU

    bhelmLSU Founding Member Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    Not true, the rule used to be that a freshman could play in the 1st 3 or 4 games. But if they played after that point a year of eligibility was used. There was also a % of snaps bylaw within the 1st 3 or 4 games. So if the player played the entire game or games during the 1st 3 or 4 games he may still have lost his redshirt eligibility that year.

    You are talking about the Medical Hardship Waiver rules which is also commonly called a medical redshirt.

    I am talking about the general freshman redshirt rule.
     
  6. Eq4bits

    Eq4bits (Deep East) Texas Tiger

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    963
    Likes Received:
    81
  7. onceanlsufan

    onceanlsufan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,661
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    Even if they did give him a redshirt, he would not play next year. I think Mett is the for sure Starter come 2012.

    Nothing personal against JJ, but I think his absence is one of the reasons the team is doing better. The RBs are doing all the running, .. and doing a dang good job of it. Lee/Mett have done well on the passing game, minus the few dropped passes in the UO game. .. and the O seems to be under control, as opposed to looking "lost". .. as was the case most of the time last year.

    This Thursday is a do or die moment for Lee. If he does well, has a reasonably high completion %, controls the game, and wins the game, he'll likely start the rest of the year. The predicted rain, if it does rain, is going to bode well for our power against MooU. I just don't think they can hang with us for 4qs in bull match situation. Ballard is no power runner. Losing the cut ability will hurt his running game, IMO.
     
  8. bhelmLSU

    bhelmLSU Founding Member Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    They would only offer a redshirt if they planned on playing him. If not, they wouldn't take a scholarship from someone else. I have no clue if they plan on doing this or not.
     
  9. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    For it to happen Jefferson would have to have charges dropped or win the case in court. This could drag on a long time.

    If Jefferson wanted to compete, Les would likely let him, but only if he's back for spring practice.
     
  10. lsu_dane

    lsu_dane Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    3,458
    Likes Received:
    1,240
    I wonder if it'd even be for the good of the team for JJ to come back next year (if possible). Would JJ be content to be a backup QB or would it just add descent to the team and make it harder for ZM to take over the reins?

    If JJ doesn't get back this year I really think it'd be best if he just graduates and moves on.
     

Share This Page