I'll try one more time and I'll use really small words. I made the comment "A plan to refinance mortgages for those in trouble is fine by me as long as it doesn't involve a government bailout." in response to an earlier post. I never proposed a plan or even supported some other plan. It was a simple statement of what was fine by me. On request I tried to clarify it for you with a couple of general "for instances" that did not involve a government bailout. Now you keep insisting that I'm saying something that you desperately want to argue against even though I don't give a rats ass. Now you keep insisting that I deliver the details of "my plan". Good luck with that :lol: I had some thoughts about the topic and I made my comments. Take 'em or leave 'em.
I support a plan to run on cars on rainbow power. That makes as much sense as the government coming up with a plan to help people who can't pay their mortgages without shifting the financial burden to someone else. That's why i was asking for an example of what this "help" might entail because it is impossible to help them, or any other borrower/investor, without a "bailout" to some degree. You clamor about helping them but don't want a bailout. It's a total paradox. They are mutually exclusive. If I'm wrong, then give me an example of how this can be done. <----4th time asking
You still haven't answered. My views are out there. You cry foul when anyone asks you to explain anything.
this is what red does. he favors something, but then wont discuss specifics. he favors taking steps to stop global warming but denies he means government boondoggles. you cant just say you want something without it meaning something. how would you enact these policies if not with tax dollars? if you mean private folks should voluntarily do something, then why are you even discussing it? i agree with you that i favor cars that run on rainbow power.
why should i care about these folks? why do they deserve anything? why do i care if they have elbow room?
And my views are out there too. I've answered several times, but you just don't like the answer. You're being like martin and trying to steer my comments into something you wish to argue against even though I'm saying something else. Bullchit. I can show you about a thousands threads that destroy that silly-ass notion.
And surprise! here is martin in his guise as schoolyard nerd taunter, singing "Nyah, nyah." I've destroyed your lame thesis in thread after thread on global warming. In detail. Start a new one and I'll be happy to do it again.
