Illegal Immigrants file 32 Million suit against Rancher

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Tigerbnd05, Feb 9, 2009.

Page 1 of 2
  1. Tigerbnd05

    Tigerbnd05 National Champs 2003 2007

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,231
    Likes Received:
    69
    Tigerbnd05, Feb 9, 2009
    #1
  2. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    This is probably about some greedy lawyer who is getting money from misguided Mexican-Americans to make this lawsuit. He'll be the only one to ever see a dime.

    Illegal Aliens have no "civil rights", they are international criminals.

    If this guy owned a ranch in North Louisiana and people were tresspassing, killing cattle, littering, burglarizing, and vandalizing his property, the law would come out and protect him. What's wrong with the Border Patrol? If this guy's ranch is a well-known and popular conduit, then why aren't Border Patrol officers posted there all the friggin time?
     
    red55, Feb 9, 2009
    #2
  3. CajunlostinCali

    CajunlostinCali Booger Eatin Moron

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    13,180
    Likes Received:
    8,283
    :hihi:

    You think!
     
    CajunlostinCali, Feb 9, 2009
    #3
  4. Tigerbnd05

    Tigerbnd05 National Champs 2003 2007

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,231
    Likes Received:
    69
    My question is how did the judge not throw this out. The immigrants must have standing to file the suit. Some lawyer may be able to correct me, but I'm with you Red, how in the hell do they have the standing to file suit if they are not citizens?
     
    Tigerbnd05, Feb 9, 2009
    #4
  5. TigerBait3

    TigerBait3 Guest

    I'm pretty sure all illegal immigrants have basic Constitutional Rights if they are within the jurisdiction of the Constitution ...free speech, due process, etc.
     
    TigerBait3, Feb 9, 2009
    #5
  6. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    26,757
    Likes Received:
    17,053
    Correct, TB3, their legal standing will come from the same interpretation that will allow the Gitmo detainees to be tried in our legal system if they are brought here.
     
    mctiger, Feb 9, 2009
    #6
  7. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156
    Likley the judge will supress the fact that they are illegal on grounds that it is discriminatory and could sway the jury.
     
    uscvball, Feb 9, 2009
    #7
  8. Tigerbnd05

    Tigerbnd05 National Champs 2003 2007

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,231
    Likes Received:
    69
    well then how do they get around the fact that they are tresspassing on his land? Granted I don't know the facts, and he probably can't prove they were doing the other things, but if nothing else they were trespassing and I would assume we still have the right to protect our property. I just think its a bunch a bull when tax paying citizens who have done nothing wrong are having to defend themselves in court against people who have no right to be here to begin with. Just my opinion.
     
    Tigerbnd05, Feb 9, 2009
    #8
  9. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    red55, Feb 9, 2009
    #9
  10. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Is it true that part of the "stimulus" package includes discount coupons for Rosetta Stone?

    I keed, I keed.
     
    SabanFan, Feb 9, 2009
    #10
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page