Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Which reminds me of....
    Bengal B likes this.
  2. So you agree that she is a lying self serving sociopath?
  3. I agree you are.
  4. Well @red55 and @Tiger in NC is still much ado about nothing? It seems that State Department IGs (2 of them) are asking the Justice Dept to open a criminal investigation into Hillary's email and the possible mishandled classified emails.
    Now you can't say it's politically inspired as these are government service bureaucrats not R congressmen just doing their job.
    This will be interesting. What does the DOJ do??? That will be a political decision.
  5. Not enough, Clintons are much too greasy to get tripped up this easy. It won't put her in jail where she belongs but it just might keep her out of the White House where she damn sure doesn't belong.
  6. Here is what the New York times stated . . .

    “Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday.”
    No quotes, no named officials, and no actual document cited. No statement from the Inspector generals and no explanation of what their concern was. Some of her emails may have contained information that was not classified at the time, but was later classified. In that case she did nothing criminal at all. Their concern may be over how certain information was classified and when.

    Bottom line: We don't know the target of this requested investigation. Is it Clinton herself in dealing with classified information over her private email server? Or is the target someone else in the State Department regarding the emails and their classification status?

    Clinton campaign spokesman Nick Merrill said "As has been reported on multiple occasions, any released emails deemed classified by the administration have been done so after the fact, and not at the time they were transmitted."

    Let me know when she is charged with a crime. Her political opponents having failed 8 times to find any wrongdoing over Benghazi are now on another witch hunt to make all kind of wild suggestions based on no evidence of any criminal acts. Let it play out. Chances are that she will not be found culpable in this either.
    Tiger in NC likes this.
  7. Just because it wasn't "classified " doesn't mean it wasn't sensitive or FOUO. The Rosenthal guy was read in on way more than he should have been.
  8. Saw this. Like @red55 I saw a lot missing from the story. We will see how it progresses. My hunch is that this is much ado about nothing. I almost would like it if the IG did an investigation just to put the thing to bed one way or another.
    LSUTiga likes this.
  9. There's not enough room in the jails for the crooks in office.
    Here's the problem I see. Too many if's and maybe's.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.