Gingrich at Republican Fundraiser Says Obama’s ‘Already Failed’

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LaSalleAve, Jun 9, 2009.

  1. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    All you have to do is look up to see the truth, I dont know if you would call that a chunk?
     
  2. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    my opinion is my opinion, and not subject to your accusations of dishonesty.

    you are aware that "worst in history" is not an official statistic, eh? just my opinion, requiring no evidence.

    i think big spending is bad. perhaps you love it it. great. in my opinion, the more you spend, the worse you are.
     
  3. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    your opinion is draped in lies, so it isnt worth shyt, someone can have an opinion based on fact, which you dont. You fail to adress the statistics in the article and run behind my opinon bullshyt.
    Spending without having the money isnt sound policy, but all of the snide remarks about perhaps I love it, shows your immaturity. Which is great, I can deal with that.
    But your opinion is still dishonest and disingenious.

    33% to 7% is a fact, and you called the one with 7% of the deficit economically the worst president.
     
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    The President is a Democrat and he is responsible for much less.
     
  5. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    obama is spending like no other president in history, is that correct or not?
     
  6. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    no its not correct. Check the article again, he has a long way before he catches up with Bush. Here is more, hopefully you will read it this time.

    Commentary: GOP's "small government" talk is hollow - CNN.com


    Here is a little bit of history for you. Obama hasnt even got in the ballgame yet, compared to your favorite person in the world.
     
  7. mobius481

    mobius481 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    33% to 7% is not a fact, it is a projection. However your point is taken. I fully expect Obama to ring up a huge amount of debt due to his ambitious programs. But none of this matters. Who cares who ran up the debt as much as why the debt was run up. Bush at 33% was because he cut taxes. Obama at 7% (projected) is going to be because he raises taxes. They both spend like out of control spoiled rich kids. Tax cuts and business cycle didn't get us into this, it was out of control spending by both parties. The article you posted vastly underestimates the deficit Obama will create.


    This is very true and is what the republican party needs to focus on, or someone needs to focus on.

    All these a**hole politicians need to STOP SPENDING MONEY THEY DONT' HAVE!
     
  8. mobius481

    mobius481 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    your quote indicates an increase in budget from 1.9 trillion to 3.1 trillion in 8 years under bush. That's an average increase of 150 billion per year. Obama's first budget goes up 500 billion so it all depends on how you look at it.
     
  9. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    Well show me your projections, sir. These people do this all day long, certainly your projections are better?:huh:
     
  10. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    You can look at it however, you want to. I am just posting facts. I dont believe the 500 billion if it is. I assume the revenue will be their to match the spending. But cutting taxes and increasing spending isnt the solution, neither is higher taxes to match the spending.

    I agree with you about not spending it to begin with. However, when people make asinin remarks about out of control spending, I think its very hypocritical in nature.
     

Share This Page