Dan Le Batard was just on "Voices", a segment that ESPN Sportscenter does. He talked about the BCS and spoke of strength of schedule and basically came to this conclusion: Maybe Oklahoma doesn't deserve to play for the BCS championship, but USC sure doesn't either No mention of LSU......Sweet He cited the fact that USC's best win (Washington State) is not as good as Oklahoma's only loss (Kansas State). I still hate the fact that Florida got ripped by them asshole ACC officials in that Florida State game. It would be nice to say the same thing about Florida that Oklahoma can say about Kansas State.
There's only one problem, one of those two teams (OU or USC) had to get picked. Kind of hard to suggest that neither team deserved it. Who else could they select? Assuming the answer is no one, then the question should be which of these two teams should have been selected as LSU's opponent? In my mind, the answer is clear, USC. I need to get over this. Hopefully, most of us will be talked out by the end of the day.
