You’ve done no such thing. The study, at no point, shows which data points on the graphs are of what age or anything or how they pulled samples of people. For all we know they could have selected data manually for optimal propaganda.
I absolutely did. You said they didn't account for age. I showed that they did that very thing. You lied.
You have a reading comprehension problem. The study was about death RATES, not absolute numbers of deaths.
Here is the title. Again. Almost twice as many Republicans than Democrats died of Covid, study says. It says “twice as many”. Not twice as “frequently. Go back to school.
Here is more from YOUR LINK The initial takeaway is that nearly double the number of Republicans died than Democrats did during the pandemic, and the evidence suggests that vaccine adoption was a key contributing factor to those deaths. yet they never show us any evidence
This is what happens when you believe in a narrative before the real facts come out. You are mentally stuck.
You are quoting the title of a newspaper article where some journalist abbreviates for sake of space, not the title of the study and not the study's results. And even at that, the subtitle of the article clarifies: "The gap in death rates between the parties grew substantially after the vaccines were introduced". So now it looks like we have to add your claim that you actually read the study to your list of lies. And, on top of that, if you DID read the study, which is highly doubtful at this point, you have a reading comprehension problem. It clearly states : "We estimate substantially higher excess death rates for registered Republicans when compared to registered Democrats".
Yea I read it. But you deflected like you always do so we have to jump back and forth. So now you agree they are estimating and assuming these things now? you know, this was my original point.
