I like Gupta but question anything Tom Daschle is involved in. I cant believe Obama hired a lobby stooge for Health & Human Services Secretary.
Come on, Daschle has been a policy advisor to a health care industry lobby firm for 2 years because he's an expert on government health policy. Before that he was in the House of Representatives for 8 years and the Senate for 18 years, rising to Majority Leader. The guy knows Washington politics, health care policy, and government administration. Plus he's been studying the heath care problem as a Senate leader for years. Daschle was first author on a book concerning health care coverage titled "Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis". The book delineates the weaknesses of previous attempts at national health coverage and sets forth plans for change.
I am sorry Red, but please, you just highlighted the problems with Daschle. 8 years as a congressman, 18 years as a Senator and 2 years as a lobbyist. In the 28 years he has been in Washington, has has not done much to solve the problem. Now that he is in the private sector, he has the answers all of a sudden? I understand the argument for experience and i agree that he has a lot of Beltway experience, but in 28 years he has not found a solution. Why should his "failed" beliefs be involved in trying to hire the next guy who will attempt to solve the healthcare problem.
So who has done more to "solve the problem"? No one. It's going to take people who have at least studied the problem and have published ideas about how to change it. What issues do you have with his ideas for changing the health system . . . or is your objection purely political? What are these failed beliefs? Make your case.
Why does health care cost as much as it does? 1) People who can pay are paying for those who can't. (Whose job is it to pay for critical care services for the indigent?) 2) Malpractice insurance is through the roof due to frivolous lawsuits, ambulance chasing, and greed. 3) Increased governmental regulation increases the costs of doing business. See HIPAA, NPI, and the like. A single payor system is *NOT* the answer. It would put millions of jobs underwater and would only further increase costs.
How does being employed for 2 years by the health lobby qualify him as an expert? What health care studies has Dachle been involved in when he was an elected official? Has any of it ever made its way into law or policy? I havent read his book but considering his employment I would venture to guess it leans heavily on whats best for the health care industry. Everyone talks a good game regarding health care but when it comes to nut cuttin time the weasels bow down to the almighty dollar. Nobody wants to address the ridiculous profits margins built in to the industry as a whole because they lobby hard for no regulation. Start regulating what a hospital can charge for an aspirin or a band aid and then we are getting somewhere. Daschle has been paid by the very entities who caused health care costs to spiral out of control. How can he be objective?
You answered none of my questions, only asked new ones. You first. You're arguing on a wild-ass guess? This is not Daschle's position. What are you talking about? From Daschle in January 2008 LINK: Here's another Daschle proposal from March 2008: LINK As far back as 2005: LINK He has been paid by the taxpayers for 26 years to oversee heath care among other things. We have a general in charge of the CIA. How can he be objective? We have a lawyer as Attorney General. How can he be objective? The guy is an expert and he has a plan. You got a better one?
it's not just about indigent health care. Most of the bankruptcies in the country are due to catastrophic illness cleaning out a family's savings. Hard-working families. Insurance-owning families. Families with money.