That the AP article about the BCS has a glaring mistake? http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=1675553 Unless I'm mistaken, USC isn't 11-1...yet. Could this be some subliminal media maneuver? AP writers read this and get that number planted in their brains? Then, if USC wins, they'll be thinking, "USC is 12-1...they've won just as many games as LSU" (assuming we beat UGA). Evidently no one proofs the crap they write. It's also on CBS Sportsline: http://cbs.sportsline.com/collegefootball/story/6883433 And it's on Foxsports.net: http://www.foxsports.com/content/view?contentId=1909340 Also on USAToday.com: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/2003-12-01-bcs_x.htm Doesn't anyone proofread????
You'd think that at least ONE person posting these articles for the websites would catch the mistake...
You'd think that at least ONE person posting these articles for the websites would catch the mistake... I'd doubt that The pac 10 is the favorite for the media types, plus they probably went to school out there.
Anytime I think Oliver Stone, I think JFK...and that scene where they show Costner showing the Zappruder film over and over...narrarting... "Back, and to the left....Back, and to the left....Back, and to the left...Back, and to the left....Back, and to the left....Back, and to the left...."
