you assume correctly. so again, cnn abc nbc npr cbs nyt wapo all liberal, as i said originally. you seemed to have some issue with my claim that abc is liberal, but i backed you down and made you admit: "My assumption is that yes they are liberal" case closed.
I've already answered this question many pages back. I've already acknowledged biases on both sides and made my feelings known about it and how it is ruining the country because we essentially get two editorialized versions of the news, never just the news. For some reason, this must threaten you or your outlook. I've acknowledged repeatedly that I watch the ABC evening news, all 30 minutes of it. There is no editorializing or opining....just here is what happened today. I stopped consuming editorialized versions of the news months ago and my life has been happier since. If you don't like ABC then I suggest you don't watch it.
THAT’S NOT EVIDENCE!!!! At best it’s an association. Do you understand the difference? There is no place where such a vague association will be considered evidence. Evidence is fact based or testimony based information you offer neither. Old people get hit by trucks. Based on your comments Betty could have been hit by a truck.
you still have no evidence to support your claims. NONE. So I am assuming you never will and I am considering this case closed until you can provide something more than "anything possible."
you are deflecting by trying to make me defend why i am arguing this. i already won this argument as yoiu conceded all of the outlets i mentioned are liberal. there is, and there always is in all news. some folks are not sophisticated enough to notice it, especially if is aligned with their biases.
its exactly evidence. if i say 99+ percent of males have balls, and i wonder if male person X has balls, i have evidence that indicates he likely does. this is me having no direct knowledge of the individual. betty white was very old. the OVERWHELMING majority of people her age are vaccinated. have you never heard of the predictive power of statistics? when the evidence showed they had DNA that narrowed the possible killers on earth to like 3 people, including OJ, was that not evidence?
correct, i cant rule that out. but i know like 90 percent of people her age are vaccinated, and some number less than that get hit by trucks. so i ask again, why are we ruling out vax booster as her cause of death? you are ruling it out, arent you?
exactly, there is a small number i cant rule it out. so why are we ruling out something, that she probably had as the cause of death?
