So, who do we want to win?

Ok, I was looking at it this way, and yes I had to look it up, but whoever wins it won't matter because LSU won't be the only team to have two crystals anymore...before looking up to see if Oklahoma had one it once before I had decided I was going to pull for them so LSU could keep that title but now, after this realization, who do we pull for?

Do we pull for a Florida team who just "beat dat ass" (lol) of the gumps, and are about as arrogant? With this decision, we will have two SEC teams with two crystals and maybe our two trophies won't seem as special in the SEC anymore.

Or

Do we pull for OU? The team we beat in the 2003 season and keep the crystal out of the SEC?

It is a hard choice for me, I went into the Bama v Florida game saying that if Bama somehow won I would never pull for them to win the NC game because I didn't want to hear "13 Championships" for the next 20 years until they get another one and because I want to see Saban fall on his ass.

But, now, I don't know who to pull for...am I traitor to the SEC if I don't want Florida to win?

 

I'll be pulling for Florida. I'm hoping for an SEC 3-PEAT.

Too much SEC pride for me. My personal rule- always pull for the SEC during Bowl games and OOC games.

We play defense and have great athletes all over the field. It's not UF's, or the SEC's fault that the Big 12 has a retarded tie-breaker rule.

OU won the Big 12 under those rules.
UF won the SEC.

As a matter of fact, I hope Florida taps it pretty good for them: 38-17 or something.


:crystal::geaux::crystal::geaux::crystal:

 

It's a titan battle of egos, Stoops vs CUM. Is it possible for them both to lose?

 

like last night, bomb threat.

 

I would not be surprised if the whole city of Miami is not sucked into the black hole egos of these two world class A-holes. Up 55-21 and Bradford is still in the game.

 

My thinking is that if Florida wins, we will start hearing the word dynasty come up again.

 

they needed to get all the votes they could amass. it was justified even though stoops would have done it anyhow.

 

i hope stoops has another fit while giving the bcs halftime intervirew. the sideline reporter asked him something like how will you move the ball against this #1 ranked lsu defense? "WE HAVE THE #1 DEFENSE, GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT"
:lol:

 

What 55-21 is not enough proof to the pollsters? I can't see how that would have mattered. They wanted to get the record for 5 consecutive games scoring 60 or more points. Plus it doesn't change the fact that Stoops is an a$$.

 

60+ coulda swayed just one more voter. but thats what they were trying to accomplish.

its a beauty pageant. the prettier the score the better.