you said in general, I take that to mean most, right?
From my experience, (and I have experience in both union and non-union companies) that's just not true, both have drawbacks.
Business owners do not negoitate contracts with unions that are not market value. And if they do it's on them. They can replace striking workers permanently, they have all the hold cards. And in the petro-chemical world, which is our main man. base, by and far, the non-union vs. union costs and compensation is very comparable, and i know, part of my duties is the elect. contract administrator for the plant I work at. I will be glad to PM you proof, if you'd like.
Get in the 21st century, that stereotype has been dead, it died with right to work, businesses abilitly to permanetly replace striking workers. The workers at the plant I worked for had a great work ethic and sense of ownership. And ExxonMobile management thinks pretty highly of their union employees.
I don't own a business, but I negoitate, and administer contracts for one of the biggest plants in this area, and am responsible for all the issues you reference. I know what I'm talking about, like I said, glad to provide proof, if you'd like.
Click to expand...