Let me try and get some sense out of this.... Seed ____2nd round__ Sweet 16__ Elite Eight__ Four__ Title game 1 100%______85______ 70_________ 42.5_____ 24______ 14 2 95% ______64______ 46 _________ 22.5_____11_______ 5 3 84% ______48______ 23__________ 14 _______9 _______2.5 4 79% ______45______ 15 __________9________2.5 _______1 5 67% ______35______ 5___________ 5______ 2.5 _________0 6 71% ______39______ 14 __________4 _____2.5________1 7 59 % _____16______ 6 ___________0 _______ 0 ________ 0 8 46%______ 11______ 7.5_________ 4_______ 1 ________ 1 9 54% ______41______ 0 ___________0_______ 0 ________0 10 41%______20______ 7.5 _________0_______ 0_________0 11 29%______11______ 4 __________ 1_______ 0_________0 12 33%______16______ 1___________ 0_______0 ________ 0 13 21%______ 4 ______0____________0_______0_________0 14 16%______ 1______ 0____________0_______0_________ 0 15 5%______ 0______ 0____________ 0_______0_________ 0 16 HAVE NEVER WON A GAME.... Ok... does that information make sense or did I screw up the numbers?
That's interesting about the 5-12 game. I know it's statisically proven that one 12 beats a 5 every year, but that's almost closer to 2 out of 4 overall than 3 out of 4.
Looks right. Thanks for doing this; I just didn't feel like doing it. There has to be a way to preserve formatting in this environment. Anyone know how? The link to the codes in the FAQs is broken for me, so I can't check there.
Won't say how or where I got this, but check it out: Round 1: Take experienced 11 or 12 seeds with a dominant backcourt or frontcourt. Good 11/12 seed upset springers 1) have won 70% or more of their regular-season games, 2) start no more than one freshman and sophomore combined, and 3) get more than 60 percent of their total scoring per game from guards or over 55 percent from frontcourt players.
