Here's a few thoughts for you to chew on.
Mike DuBose has a winning record against Steve Spurrier. I guess we'll say DuBose is a better coach than Spurrier as well, eh?
In characterizing Spurrier's success at Florida you've chosen to say "he kicked both LSU & Bama's ass in the West badly." I've not bothered to look at his record against LSU or how "badly" an "ass" was kicked. I do know that in 1991 Florida beat Bama 35-0. In 1999 Bama beat Florida 34-7. Both games were instances where both teams were defeated soundly. Overall, in the series, the average score has been a point differential of less than five points.
Damn strong points? Like this one?
“Our commissioner seems to think if Alabama-Tennessee is not a conference game, no one will want to watch it,” Spurrier said. “I told him, you think no one wants to watch South Carolina play Clemson? We’ve got North Carolina in the first game of the season; a border rival, our stadium will be full. You think no one will want to watch that?
“If the commissioner doesn’t think that’s a big game, he should come watch it. So there you go, Nick can have his nine (conference) games. I’m all for it.”
More people watched the Spongebob Squarepants movie last year when it was broadcast the same night as UofSC vs Clemson.
Want to go a little deeper in to this statement? This is with South Carolina ranked 12th, Clemson ranked 11th. And more TV households are tuned to a cartoon than this "big game" Spurrier talks about?
He says his stadium will be full. What's that saying exactly? Because stadium is full it translates to a "big game?" South Carolina packed their stadium week in and week out when they didn't win a game all season.
Here's some irony. All this talk about Bama vs UT being a game no one cares about and it's the #1 rated show in ESPN the Saturday night it was broadcast. It carried 4.223 million homes.
Spongebob? 3.2 million.
UofSC vs Clemson? 3.1 million.
No TT, he's not making a "damn strong point." He's running his mouth, again.
Watch and see. You'll find the UofSC vs North Carolina to be viewed by fewer households that Thursday night than the Ole Miss vs Vandy game. Part of that has to do with the kick time: 6PM EST vs 8PM EST.
ESPN, a corporation known to capitalize on its broadcast, has chosen to broadcast Vandy vs Ole Miss over this "big game" of South Carolina's? In prime time, no less?
__________________________________________________________
Changing tunes a bit here...here's a great example of lazy journalism.
Notice this paragraph from Matt Hayes:
As wild as Spurrier's idea sounds, there is precedent. California played Colorado as a non-conference game in 2011 -- the first year CU entered the Pac12. The teams had a previously scheduled series when CU was part of the Big 12, and kept the game as a non-con game.
There's precedent found in the SEC. There's precedent found with Bama vs UT when the SEC only required six games and Bama played UT in addition to their SEC schedule. It certainly would have made Hayes point more salient.