Should contributing members

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by SabanFan, Sep 9, 2004.

?

Should we be able to ban people?

  1. Yes

    12 vote(s)
    23.1%
  2. No

    40 vote(s)
    76.9%
  1. MarineTiger

    MarineTiger Founding Member

    I voted yes mainly because....I knew it didnt matter what I voted for...:lol:
     
  2. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    I had to vote no. I have a lot of fun messing with some of the posters who would get banned by somebody in a heartbeat.
     
  3. DallasLSU

    DallasLSU Founding Member

    I don't think members should be able to straight up be able to ban people...But maybe have the option for submitting a ban to Brett...
     
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Nah. Brett only bans people for major rules violations, usually after warnings. Not for just being unpopular, and never just for being a tool.
     
  5. MobileBengal

    MobileBengal Founding Member

    Hell no.









    Again....Hell no.
     
  6. SG_Geaux

    SG_Geaux Founding Member

    ABSOLUTELY NOT !!!!

    You allow that, and you'll have people getting banned like crazy just because someone didn't like what they said.
     
  7. diamondheadtiger

    diamondheadtiger Founding Member

    Absolutely not. This aint the Auburnt board where the pu$$y members call for LSU posters to be banned day in day out. The ignore feature works well here. Non members should'nt be allowed to give rep points though. :) :) :) :) :)
     
  8. G_MAN113

    G_MAN113 Founding Member

    I don't think they are. That's one of the perks of being a contributor.
     
  9. diamondheadtiger

    diamondheadtiger Founding Member

    I have rep points from non members :) :) :) :) :)
     
  10. Swerved

    Swerved It appears my hypocrisy knows no bounds.

    Nope... the administrator/owner is the only one who has or should have the authority to ban people. That's the way it should be in my opinion.
     

Share This Page