Russian issues

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUpride123, Mar 3, 2017.

  1. el005639

    el005639 Founding Member

    unless your last name is clinton
     
  2. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

    of course I read those links,.. this time I posted nearly the entire article. Did you read it?.. here are the highlights;

    .....Trump is caught on tape laying out the terms of the treasonous deal he cut with the Russian government (offering to make political concessions to Russia, in exchange for Russia hacking Trump’s election opponents), in order to rig the election in his favor – and that three of his advisers are caught discussing it on a separate recording.
    ..... U.S. intelligence has these recordings in hand.

    Hard to get FISA approval, yeah, you need very strong evidence.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-obtained-fisa-warrant-to-monitor-former-trump-adviser-carter-page/2017/04/11/620192ea-1e0e-11e7-ad74-3a742a6e93a7_story.html?utm_term=.e47f0c4c834c
    ....The FBI obtained a secret court order last summer to monitor the communications of an adviser to presidential candidate Donald Trump, part of an investigation into possible links between Russia and the campaign, law enforcement and other U.S. officials said.

    The FBI and the Justice Department obtained the warrant targeting Carter Page’s communications after convincing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge that there was probable cause to believe Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power, in this case Russia, according to the officials.

    This is the clearest evidence so far that the FBI had reason to believe during the 2016 presidential campaign that a Trump campaign adviser was in touch with Russian agents. Such contacts are now at the center of an investigation into whether the campaign coordinated with the Russian government to swing the election in Trump’s favor.

    :cool: removing classified information,.. string her up by her heels, I don't care,.. quit changing the subject, this thread is about Trump not Hillary.
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2017
  3. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

    Last edited: Apr 17, 2017
  4. el005639

    el005639 Founding Member

    GDF you do realize that the reason we are skeptical of these reports is the people who are writing these now are the same shit heads that turned a blind eye when it came to obama and hillary. we desperately need an unbiased media in this country.
     
    GiantDuckFan likes this.
  5. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood


    There is no tape. If there was a major news source would have it.
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  6. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

    I get that, skepticism is a good approach in this case, but pooh poohing all this as nonsense is not being realistic, a lot of this is coming from different shitheads, and the evidence is mounting.
     
  7. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Again, there is no tape dude. CNN isnt even reporting it.
     
  8. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Blogs are not evidence.
     
  9. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

    your assuming that, and it's not necessarily true,.. they say the FBI, and the Congressional investigators have the tapes, and I'll take their word for it over yours.
     
  10. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

    tell it to the FBI
     

Share This Page