The ones they paid for. The ones in the dossier. I don't know what they are, but they paid for something, Doesn't mean they were true, but they paid for misdeeds on Trump. Thats what the entire dossier bit is about.

It’s a slippery slope though. How can you look at one and say it’s a crime but the other isn’t. So if Trump and his team continue to push for this on Clinton aren’t they setting themselves up?

True but what about the DNC/GOP?

Lines are blurred.

It makes me wonder. Like if Hillary Clinton came out and started doing things like tweeting about a crime being committed by Trump for getting intel from Russia, she would essentially be accusing herself of the same thing de facto, just different players.

The more and more I think about it, I’m actually glad she didn’t become president, because at least with Trump, he doesn’t have the backing she had to cover up all her bullshit and I don’t think he is smart enough to get away with criminal activity. But that shady ass bitch....different story.

That being said if this were someone like Marco Rubio, I think he would be protected. Trump being an outsider doesn’t garner the same level of protection, at least that’s what it looks like to the casual observer or this one anyway.

That was my initial position. I don’t see why they are different.

One difference is that one got information and the other didn't.

Per the MSNBC talking heads the laws are such that it doesn’t matter. Sick of it.

The dossier was a lie a fabrication where are the "misdeeds"?

So if I go to rob a bank and they have no money it’s all good? No crime?

There is a Mississippi River Bank in Belle Chase. It is located on the banks of the Mississippi River.

I don't know how that is relevant to anytbing but somehow your post made me think of it.