Forums Register login What's New?
January 6
Page 312 of 371
  1. At the moment SHE'S A WITNESS. This is not a criminal court. She will have been issued a congressional subpoena as part of Congress's constitutional oversight authority. If you don't like what Congress is investigating VOTE THEM OUT. Otherwise, suck it up because the alternative is autocratic rule. No, wait, that's what you want, isn't it? trump, unencumbered by law, free to do whatever he chooses to do.

    Oh, really? How many times has her house been searched? And if she hasn't committed any crime what does she have to fear?
  2. no she hasnt. please try to acquaint yourself with the basics of the case.

    thats not how justice works. you dont justify messing with people this way. you sound like trump who idiotically thinks taking the 5th means you are guilty. you cant justify investigating people because they should have nothing to fear.

    again, i understnd the strategy here. instead of convicting or really even charging anyone, the dems are using investigation itself as a way to condemn their political opponents, to create a cloud of suspicion.

    again, its like if i came to your house and searched and investigated you and your records and communication, and told you we dont know what you did, thats why the fuck we are there to find out. and then we further justified it by telling you that you shouldnt care if you are innocent.

    this is an effort to deflect with a stupid accusation. grow up.
  3. I don’t recall his name but that was Stalin’s head of KGB line. Give me a person and I will find the crime. You wouldn’t have an issue with being swept up in surveillance and subpoenaed while they investigated your innocence? If you’re not guilty of anything you wouldn’t have a problem with that, huh?
  4. To what?
    Jmg and LSUpride123 like this.
  7. He is a 5D42E8C7-71A1-4804-9877-19F5A69B98C1.jpeg . Logic doesn’t reside within them
    shane0911 likes this.
(You have insufficient privileges to reply here.)
Page 312 of 371