ESPN's Power 16

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by mcmikel, Aug 20, 2005.

  1. mcmikel

    mcmikel Founding Member

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/powerranking?season=2005&week=1

    9 LSU 9-3 149 LSU is going to have to throw the ball to have success. Right now, that means opposing secondaries have the advantage.

    ... thus adding ESPN to the clueless pile of national media "experts". How long before one of their talking heads begins to rave about the depth LSU has at tailback?
     
  2. Seabriscut

    Seabriscut Founding Member

    Who doesn't have to throw the ball to have success?
     
  3. MikeD

    MikeD Sports Genius

    Not many people can be successful running the ball with 9 or 10 in the box. The Ravens could during Jamal Lewis' 2000 yard season but not many other people can. Having a competent passing game is always important...
     
  4. Tygrr

    Tygrr Win the West

    I don't believe they're trying to overlook LSU's running game, rather implying that they need to find a passing game or else the offense will be too predictable with run run run all the time.
     
  5. JVincent25

    JVincent25 Founding Member

    Well then, every team above us in their power rankings with the exception of USC and Michigan is pretty predictable.
     
  6. milohimself

    milohimself Founding Member

    ... And Ohio State and Tennessee, maybe even Miami.
     
  7. JVincent25

    JVincent25 Founding Member

    Ohio State? Sorry, just because they're below average in both rushing and passing doesn't make them unpredictable. Tennessee? You guys have more uncertainty at QB than us, at least we have a pretty good idea who our starter is. Miami? They have a new QB and a new RB, plus all of their receivers outside of one seem to not have the ability to catch the football yet.
     
  8. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    So ESPN.com says LSU will have to throw the ball to have success. ESPN Magazine says it doesn't matter who LSU's starting QB is, all he will be doing is handing off. What do we learn from this? We learn ESPN is clueless where LSU is concerned. Further evidence of this (from the ESPN mag again) is the reference to USC going after its third consecutive BCS championship. Huh?
     
  9. scrappy

    scrappy Founding Member

    I agree. Everyone knows that the Tigers have the ability to run all over the place. But, this is that whole QB thing again that gets extremely old, but is def important. The QB's have to make the team 3D or this team will never see its ultimate potential. If they can make the passing game a bigger factor there is no reason this team cant win 9 or 10 games. I do think that people can get away with being 1D, ala the Ravens headed the year they won, but playing in a toughie like the SEC, throwing is vital. So, like always, the world is not against you guys. They are just stating facts. Maybe it could have been worded different.:geauxtige
     
  10. mcmikel

    mcmikel Founding Member

    Like "pay up?"
     

Share This Page