Yes. Dominion machines do not meet Texas standards. It was not a complicated statement.

They can still be. Blockchain events are real, you can see them. You can verify them, but you CANT see who it is.

Funny .... anytime anyone brings up a point that would make the election more legitimate, the Democrats or people who support them start making up excuses. Even when they learn that the machine can assign a number but still retain anonymity, they still object, which mean their original excuse was not valid.

I didn't give a complicated answer. Texas wanted a feature Dominion did not and does not include on their machines. No question of standards, just different ethics.

Yea and you wouldn't need some fucked up clunky machine to do it. The technology is already there.

As we have mentioned many times, the problem with Dominions machines and process is the error rate. Once a ballot throws an error, states like Georgia, PA, etc allow the "poll workers" to recreate the ballot. SO any handcount/hand re-count is already tainted.

Unless you believe McDonalds workers.... These people can't get your order right but they controlled the election.

Oh Well. On to the future.

That was not your original point. Your original point was:



Texas was such a state that banned them because of security flaws.

I guess you missed my previous answer. I don't mind reposting it for you again...

Trump: The machines were "turned down by Texas and many others because they were not good or secure."
Verdict: It's true that Texas did not provide certification for the machines. Their approach is different to other states.

The US federal government provides guidelines for certifying voting machines - which is meant to produce a common standard across the country.

However, Texas has stipulated additional requirements, which the Dominion machines are unable to satisfy, such as that each ballot has a unique number so it can be traced.

Not all states put these unique numbers on ballots, such as California, because of concerns over voter privacy.

"If you forbid these unique numbers you create a stronger privacy guarantee for the voter. On the flipside, you are compromising a modest security measure," says Dan Wallach, a computer scientist at Rice University in Texas, and an advisor on national guidelines for voting machines.

The regulations and rules across each state vary significantly, but the US government cyber-security agency has expressed its confidence in voting machines used across the country.

"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."

At this point in time, 28 states certify Dominion voting machines.

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54959962

What Trump said was True. Thank you for proving that to yourself.

i'm confused by this response. Please explain your definition of ethics vs standards. I googled to find an explanation and this is what i found: Ethical standards are based on the human principles of right and wrong. The differences between them are these: Legal standards are based on written law, while ethical standards are based on human rights and wrongs. Something can be legal but not ethical.

was this your intent?

There's no evidence that Trump was right about that, like so many other things Trump says.

JOINT STATEMENT FROM ELECTIONS INFRASTRUCTURE GOVERNMENT COORDINATING COUNCIL & THE ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR COORDINATING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES

WASHINGTON – The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) - released the following statement:

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

“Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.

“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.”

https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/1...ture-government-coordinating-council-election