Actually, a bunch of Republican legislators have made this claim AGAIN WITH NO EVIDENCE. Attributing this "story’ to PA implies the state has made the revelation. In fact the state dismisses this wild allegation as yet another instance of mis-information!
yes ... go figure .... a state of democrat judges etc denying any fraud and obstructing the effort to investigate.
the state of PA did not announce that. A group of Republican lawmakers in PA announced it. The response: https://wjactv.com/news/local/pa-re...nds-presidential-election-numbers-dont-add-up The Pennsylvania Department of State released the following statement in response to the Republicans' claims: "In today’s release Rep. Ryan and others rehash, with the same lack of evidence and the same absence of supporting documentation, repeatedly debunked conspiracy theories regarding the November 3 election. State and federal judges have sifted through hundreds of pages of unsubstantiated and false allegations and found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting. "Now, the legislators have given us another perfect example of the dangers of uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge. "For instance, it is quite common to have significant "undervotes" for down-ballot races in a presidential election, particularly when there isn't a U.S. Senate race on the ballot. In 2000, Sen. Santorum received 200,000 more votes than President Bush, but the US Senate race still had more than 100,000 fewer votes than the presidential race. and more blah blah blah. Another thing that needs more investigation. Either there was massive election fraud, on an individual state by state basis, with different fraud in each state, or there are individual things that happen in every election and these are outliers, rather than the norm. I get it. This was close. I am more experienced with outliers and their insignificant impact on data than I am with outliers changing everyone's perception.
Isn’t it you who constantly gave the answer “ I’ll defer to the GOP SOS”? What, now these GOP members are biased again? An hour ago they were impartial according to you.
You appear to be confused. I have addressed GOP appointed judges and GOP election officials, but never GOP Legislators.
The solution to all of this is easy. ... be transparent and let the PUBLIC see the evidence!! Until they do that, it is a they said, they said scenario!! Their words are shit, and you know it!! Nobody trust a damn thing they say. You have to let the players play, in the open, on TV for ALL to see!! When you have a Roll Tide Referee calling the shots, you can see the crime ... and the referree denies it, it doesn't make it any better!! Just think about that pass interference "no call" in the Saints Rams game!! Didn't matter in the outcome, but EVERYONE at least acknowledged that it happened!!
yessir. There are needs with new tech and more mail ins in future elections, there needs to be more accountability, more understanding of electronic ballot counting, how it is done, who oversees these things. More rules on when mail ins get counted. Maybe who can mail in vs. who can't. It doesn't matter if Dez made the catch, or if there was pass interference in the Saints Rams game, shit still was what it was. I have yet to see the replay that I can believe without doubt. Like you said, they said, they said. This is not the ultimate or penultimate end to how this country is going to be. I trust in this process for the time being. I like the young ones making position. Today and tomorrow.
