It is a crime. ALL documentation connected to an election much be preserved for 22 mo. On this basis alone, the vote in MI should be considered null and void. Redo. What happens to paper ballots after elections? | kgw.com "According to federal law, in elections where candidates are nominated or elected to federal office, all ballots, voter registration records and other election materials must be retained for at least 22 months after the election."
As I understand it, the Software was deliberately set to kick out ballots at a 60-70% error rate. Once the ballot is sent to adjudication, the ballot can be changed on the computer. This means that in order to assess fraud, you have to go back and compare the machine vote and the paper vote of every ballot, AND .. this is what the Democrats are fighting tooth and nail. As a person with integrity and dignity, It only makes sense to go back and officially audit the election comparing the paper ballots to the machine ballots.
My only advice is before digging in one’s heels on an issue, one should consider as many views as possible. It seems, over and over again, people (not just on this board) grasp at any straw that supports/confirms their view and hold on. Maybe it’s my Intel background, but I want as many sources as I can find, from as many perspectives I can find, before forming an opinion. It is critical to assess two things. The Intel/information and the credibility of the source. The rancor that permeates this thread, the Covid thread, hell, all the threads, pretty much mirrors the chasm found in the "real world" and is beyond discouraging. I’m not confidant our country will recover.
Yes HWR ... and it could ALL be put to rest with a completely transparent audit of the vote. I have no problem with Joe being president if he won fair and square. SO .. do what needs to be done to remove my doubts. Until then, I"ll have doubts, particularly about 2 issues. 1) the computer issues and adjudication fraud. 2) manufactured votes from non-existent voters. AND .. considering that "hot spots" have been identified, we don't need to audit ALL the votes, just the one's identified in the hotspots ... particularly, Milwaukee, Detroit, Philly, Atlanta, Mericopa county in AZ.
There is a paper vote audit being conducted today! The clerks and others from both parties will hand-tally every vote cast for president in the general election in Antrim County. The clerks involved from other cities will be Lansing City Clerk Chris Swope, Rochester Hills City Clerk Tina Barton and others. The audit will be live-streamed at 9 a.m. on the Michigan Department of State social media accounts, and results will be shared publicly when it's finished.
Probably the most intelligent thing you've said in a while. You are right, we should find out as much as possible. Like just how is it that that all of these statistical impossibilities happen magically at 3am? In 4 different states!
Factual data doesn't have multiple sides. I still think you haven't even read it have you? What the guy found isn't even being disputed. What you are searching for is validation. People dont like the guy because of his past opinions. That is fine. Read whatever you want, but what he found is correct. Lets review: The purpose of this forensic audit is to test the integrity of Dominion Voting System in how it performed in Antrim County, Michigan for the 2020 election. The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity. The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws These errors occurred after The Antrim County Clerk provided a re-provisioned CF card with uploaded software for the Central Lake Precinct on November 6, 2020. This means the statement by Secretary Benson was false. The Dominion Voting System produced systemic errors and high error rates both prior to the update and after the update; meaning the update (or lack of update) is not the cause of errors. Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software. Removal of these files violates state law and prevents a meaningful audit, even if the Secretary wanted to conduct an audit. We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed. The Election Event Designer Log shows that Dominion ImageCast Precinct Cards were programmed with new ballot programming on 10/23/2020 and then again after the election on 11/05/2020. These system changes affect how ballots are read and tabulated, and our examination demonstrated a significant change in voter results using the two different programs. In accordance with the Help America Vote Act, this violates the 90-day Safe Harbor Period which prohibits changes to election systems, registries, hardware/software updates without undergoing re-certification. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures – Michigan requires full compliance with federal standards as determined by a federally accredited voting system laboratory. Michigan resident Gustavo Delfino, a former professor of mathematics in Venezuela and alumni of University of Michigan, offered a compelling affidavit [Exhibit 2] recognizing the inherent vulnerabilities in the SmartMatic electronic voting machines (software which was since incorporated into Dominion Voting Systems) during the 2004 national referendum in Venezuela (see attached declaration). After 4 years of research and 3 years of undergoing intensive peer review, Professor Delfino’s paper was published in the highly respected "Statistical Science" journal, November 2011 issue (Volume 26, Number 4) with title "Analysis of the 2004 Venezuela Referendum: The Official Results Versus the Petition Signatures." The intensive study used multiple mathematical approaches to ascertain the voting results found in the 2004 Venezuelan referendum. Delfino and his research partners discovered not only the algorithm used to manipulate the results, but also the precise location in the election processing sequence where vulnerability in machine processing would provide such an opportunity. According to Prof Delfino, the magnitude of the difference between the official and the true result in Venezuela estimated at 1,370,000 votes. Our investigation into the error rates and results of the Antrim County voting tally reflect the same tactics, which have also been reported in other Michigan counties as well. This demonstrates a national security issue.
Will they verify signatures? Voter roll match!? If you have a pile of illegal ballots and you count them and get x, if you count them again you will probably get x! Have to throw out the fakes
