I'll be the 1st to tell you if we do a full audit of the software and it comes back clean, cool. But I refuse to let the media say "there is nothing there". I aint blind!

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...se-suspicions-about-rigged-elections-n2579946

The Old Tweet From Biden's WH Chief of Staff Pick Which Will Not Defuse Suspicions About Rigged Elections

no, not really

yep,.. 8 years,.. that was a little poke at @LSUpride123, just for the fun of it, I expect he'll jab me back, that's what we do, how we became good friends

I don't much care who won/wins the election, we're gonna be fine/fucked either way,.. but I care very much about our elections being fair,.. that's worth going to war over to me

It would appear that the main fraudulent activity is connected to the use of the Dominion Machines and Software. The glitch is a really ingenious trick .. the machine itself accurately counts the votes, but the compiler that uploads the totals into the grand total makes adjustments. The rationale, if you you have a precinct with a 1000 voters in it, and something seems amiss, then it is easy to audit the vote. On the other hand, when the precinct totals are uploaded and compiled, if the program moves a percentage of votes from one candidate to another, then, 1) it is not obvious there is a discrepancy because now you are dealing with millions of votes, and 2), you have no way of knowing where the the discrepancy is. Thus, when an auditor goes back to check, physically counts the votes, then compares it to the precinct computer total, all looks fine. An audit would literally have to count all the votes by hand, compare to the machine, then manually compile the totals from the precincts, and compare to the computerized compilation. Further, this would have to be done in a stepwise fashion, such that you would be able to identify when "switched votes or dropped votes" occurs.

Like I've said, if the Democrats ... and Winston, had a shred of integrity, they would support doing exactly what I described above (with both Biden and Trump officials involved in the hands on verification at every step). They could start out with Michigan. If it comes out that votes are valid and the count is accurate, then there is no beef on my part. I wouldn't gripe about other States if Michigan were truth. HOWEVER, the refusal to verify the vote demonstrates a lack of integrity, and hints at not wanting to get to the truth, which hints at knowledge that the vote is not the truth.

I wonder if Georgia's audit will be that comprehensive, where they can flush this out. If so then all close swing States subject to the same fraud should have a similar audit.

The stats around the country for this election are truly bizarre. Something's more than amiss at the Circle K, the Circle K disappeared!

Why not just start with votes that only had a vote for the president, count those and compare to the results if there is a difference dig deeper.

Sounds EXACTLY like what was discussed in the documentary 'Hacking Democracy'.

I don't think they'd have to go to such extreme measure AT FIRST. I would look at the registered Republican voter names and see if the official record shows any of them voting Democrat. Because that HAD to have happened if votes were switched from Trump to Biden. Then, I would interview those folks to see if they did indeed have a last minute change of heart to vote Biden. Based on those results, that's when the full fledged audit of the system, hardware, and software, could begin.

Was just reading on RCP ... the GOP smashed the Democrats in State Houses. It makes ZERO sense that the GOP smashed the State Houses, yet Biden somehow miraculously comes out on top. Especially given that the Democrats themselves note that so many votes were "straight ticket" votes.

There is something fishy going on, ... it's just a matter of whether or not our FEDERAL GOVERNMENT will MAKE States play by the rules. Given that the Swamp is full of Democrats ... I"m not holding my breath.

Damn, that was pre-Trump too.