Climate Change

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Kikicaca, Aug 9, 2021.

  1. Kikicaca

    Kikicaca Meaux

    Frantically? I think not. It was easy as proving you wrong about everything you think you know about the climate.

    So have you explained what caused the wild swings of glacial and interglacial period shown in the Vostok Ice Cores? Cows, SUV's, fossil fuels?
    Vostok-Ice-Core-Data.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  2. onceanlsufan

    onceanlsufan Founding Member

    Post the study instead of your lame bull shit answers.
     
  3. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

     
  4. onceanlsufan

    onceanlsufan Founding Member

    Context GDF. "nasa is lying?" as an answer to post the study b.s. and is a deferment to "authority". Just because it is NASA doesn't mean it is pristine and honest.

    Like I said ... post the damn study!
     
  5. GiantDuckFan

    GiantDuckFan be excellent to each other Staff Member

  6. onceanlsufan

    onceanlsufan Founding Member

  7. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    AS IF you would read them. There are at least 200 studies. I'm not going to be playing chase the goalpost here with you because you're not interested in their content, anyway.

    And, oh, by the way, don't pretend to know the rules of logic and argumentation, because you don't. An appeal to appropriate authority is PERFECTLY acceptable; it is an appeal to an inappropriate authority that's the logical fallacy. Carry on.
     
  8. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    A decrease in cloud cover is one of the many catastrophic consequences predicted by climate scientists for quite some time. Yes, it very well could be true that a decrease in cloudiness causes more warming now than greenhouse gases, but that's like putting the cart before the horse. It's higher CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere that drives the clouds higher in the first place. Analogy: light a match, ignite a pile of dead leaves. Which now is generating more heat?

    You know, ten years ago people such as yourself, in an attempt to protect fossil fuel industries, denied that the Earth is warming at all. Now, when thermometers have proved you wrong, you admit the warming but try to blame other causes, even citing data and studies you've truncated and misinterpreted, and that don't in the whole support what you hope them to say. I guess you didn't notice that nowhere in your link do those scientists exonerate fossil fuels? They only compare two EFFECTS of warming within the cycle of warming.
     
  9. Kikicaca

    Kikicaca Meaux

    DEMOCRAT WORD MEANING #9
    Peer reviewed= like minded anti capitalist wacko eviromentalist covering for there friends research
     
  10. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Funny... your compadre used "peer reviewed" as an accolade in his own post. Regardless of the merits of THAT particular term, I at least know the difference between "there" and "their" and how to use them.
     

Share This Page