I'll answer your question after you answer mine. Was it the case I mentioned or something else? And can you refute his position on executive power based on the article he wrote just 2 years ago? As to your question, can you be more specific? Did he write an opinion saying what you claim?
I beg to differ. Far more than 500 would agree that 500 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean is a good start. Were he not to be confirmed, it would say a whole lot worse.
Just a hater, naw,.. that doesn't sound like the LaSalle I know. Looking at me, I could quibble nonstop about things I read here, but usually I don't,.. it's not like I ever change any minds anyhow, I don't like chaffing feelings, so I ignore a lot,.. sometimes I gotta speak up,.. sometimes I get bored and feel more like hashing stuff out.
ya gotta be realistic,.. the republicans are picking their man,.. very doubtful that you're going to like any of their choices. This guy doesn't seem so bad to me, if he's rejected, the next guy could be worse, with growing pressure mounting on the democrats to confirm,.. reject a second guy,.. and Don Jr could probably get confirmed.
this stuff can get under your skin but lasalle ain't a hater...he's one of the good guys a little too rachel maddow for me but other than that...
It's worth remembering that The New York Times routinely ridiculed and trashed Robert Goddard, a true visionary who, among many things, created the first liquid fueled rockets: New York Times: That Professor Goddard, with his "chair" in Clark College and the countenancing of the Smithsonian Institution, does not know the relation of action and reaction, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react—to say that would be absurd. Of course he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools. New York Times - 47 Years later: Further investigation and experimentation have confirmed the findings of Isaac Newton in the 17th Century and it is now definitely established that a rocket can function in a vacuum as well as in an atmosphere. The Times regrets the error. The New York Times has a long history of being totally full of shit. They trashed the best of the best.
