Wrong, the life you experience now and the long healthy energy using person you are is because of Natural resource development. Pollution is...
Each one of these things can relate to a possitve. Loss of crops in one area means growth in another.
First let me state I have no issue with Nat Gas. None at all. IF you are truly all of the above, show an equal playing ground... Coal is the...
Even Clinton got his pole smoked.
I challenged that and you didn't offer anything. You mentioned something's would happen, but why that is bad is unclear as provided by history.
Then lay out this indisputable rate...
Maybe, maybe not. You still have no point Make a point. Why will regulation improve Climate change? Why is climate change bad? Cool,...
Wrong. The new emission standards prohibit this. You are focusing on price, but the price is being dictated by regulation. Regulation...
Did I say you did? I have been very clear..
We have a ton of Nat gas, but the BTU content is the major difference. Check the regulations and then get back to me as why coal is declining....
Then why is their record of higher CO2 levels before humans? Was it giant piles of shit from the Dino's? Why has the earth experienced many...
I understand your point. I don't understand the governments and people who support laws in which they tax the people for use of energy (C02...
But that's my point. This issue of "climate change" has existed before humans. What exactly are we trying to fix here? Pollution aside b/c...
"Carbon dioxide concentrations may have been up to sixteen times higher about 60 million years ago without producing runaway greenhouse...
Why is this "damage" bad? Why is producing a better quality of life bad? What bad things happen if the earth warms? Why is a warmer...
@Winston, time to eat more meat.... "The 400-page report by the Food and Agricultural Organisation, entitled Livestock's Long Shadow, also...
Who says we don't? Really? Its the people who claim we are the "cause" that should be punched in the face because "they" are the ones who are...
What about them? Point is we "need" more to study. Coal is cheep and abundant yet the EPA is about to destroy it. Take a guess why.
Yet we try to pass legislation....
Huh? Have you not read through all the climate threads where the supporters of Global Warming constantly state the claims of scientist?
