martin: I don't think most christians would say you deserve it.....they would say there is good evidence that God may decide you deserve it....
Red: It's not a fantasy. Its an event that was documented. And the psychiatrist is an expert on mental illness. His judgement was that this...
I think you're being overly skeptical of the ability of courts to administer justice. If anything I would bet the "default" error in the courts...
spikke: I don't know which law they are in violation of exactly but they plainly are building illegal settlements. Why are they allowed to do...
Eyewitness testimony does not require any additional evidence to be correct. In the absence of any physical evidence one would have to make a...
Red: This is where I think you have gone wrong. There is a supernatural element to existence. And we have eyewitness accounts of it...
Well, as far as immigration policies go I would not decide immigration based on religion, to be honest. I would base it more on languages. I...
I don't see what is dishonest about it. Your argument wins on a technicality. You rule out the actor I think is responsible for the situation so...
Bengal Buddy: I agree with you...just not sure the policy of the US would be so different in either case. The Soviet Union was armed to the...
According to you then, this country was founded by lunatics and the psychiatrist in the case mentioned is a lunatic. ok, rock on then...
I am perfectly willing to accept that I don't know everything. I have no problem with this. If you have any evidence about my errors please let...
Well, assuming this is true for moment, what do you do about it? We can't go wiping all the Muslims off the planet....
Red: Only the natural part of existence. It can say nothing regarding the supernatural. One must come to a decision about the supernatural...
Red: I thought we agreed science had nothing to offer regarding the supernatural. That's why I was using the courtroom analogy. I don't...
gumborue: you pouring on the charm again? you're a tribute to the board, my friend.
regarding argument from ignorance: There is psychiatrist in this case....he should be qualified. There were other eyewitnesses who confirmed...
There is no evidence that they are lying. The quy is an expert for God's sake. Why do you refuse to accept his account of the event? On what basis?
Lasalle: Well, you obviously wouldn't be a witness for those saying the supernatural exists. What I am saying is that there are other people...
People can't do that, I agree. But eyewitnesses say that people have....so what's your explanation then? Are they lying? Really....you think...
