1. I give some credit to Steele but our inept offense put up 320 yards on him not counting the numerous dropped passes. Not impressed. They will get smoked several times this year. Good riddance
    lsu-i-like and LSU_4_LIFE like this.
  2. This isn't a problem LSU is going to have. That's a problem that Wisconsin is going to have.
    LSU_4_LIFE likes this.
  3. Oh, I'm glad we showed Steele the door. I think he just highlighted that our offense can be well-defended by ANYONE.
    lsu-i-like and Rouxleaux like this.
  4. agreed
  5. Aranda will make both asshole Chavis and Steele look average soon.
    lsu-i-like likes this.
  6. I dont know about all that. We beat Michigan State away, and we beat LSU when you say this is a problem LSU wont have but Wisconsin will....o_O
    lsu-i-like likes this.
  7. You think LSU lost because Wisconsin has equal to or superior talent to LSU? Wisconsin won because they played better.
    Rouxleaux likes this.
  8. Their players were allowed to play and not handcuffed by 3 plays two of which is run into a stacked box. Dont forget we could of should have still won that game. All we needed was LF centering the ball on a couple of runs and then a field goal and we win. Of course we would still have miles. I guess things happen for a reason
  9. The discussion involved Dave Aranda and his weakness as a DC being that his scheme is good, but only if you're not playing a more talented team. I pointed out that there aren't any teams more talented than LSU's so that shouldn't be an issue at LSU like it was at Wisconsin. He responded by missing the point and telling us Wisconsin won the game.
    lsu-i-like likes this.
  10. I was agreeing with you and I know what the discussion was. I am also pointing out that our losing the game had very little to do with Aranda's weaknesses and more with our inept O.