Where would things be if DJT were president now, assuming he did actually back Ukraine……a very big assumption? Here is what he told Stuart Varney yesterday. Tell me if you can make a bit of sense of it. Donald J. Trump, 45th president of the United States, and GOP presidential front-runner for 2024, called into Stuart Varney’s show on Fox Business Monday and…. (Please stop me if you’ve heard this before.) …reminded us what a thoroughgoing clusterf*ck his mind is. Mediaite @Mediaite "I listened to [Putin] constantly using the n-word. That's the n-word," former President Trump told @FoxBusiness host Stuart Varney before clarifying he meant the "nuclear word." March 21st 2022 1,732 Retweets8,980 Likes During the interview, Varney tried in vain to get a coherent answer from Trump about what he would do in Ukraine. “There’s this discussion about whether we should send jets, MiG jets to help the Ukrainian Air Force. Would you send in that kind of help?' Varney prompted the former commander-in-chief. “Well maybe even more,” Trump answered,” to be honest with you.” More? “Like what, Mr. President, like what?' Varney asked as Trump launched into a meandering word salad (and yes, a mixed metaphor seems perfectly appropriate in this context). Let me just explain that Putin is saying things like, Don’t you dare send anything in. In the meantime he’s killing thousands and thousands of people. So he’s acting like we’re an aggressor if we send in some old 44-year-old plane that probably gets shot at in the sky pretty quickly, and he’s acting like we’re terrible people if we do that. But he’s killing tens of thousands of people, far more than they’re reporting. Varney tried. Again. “What do you do now?” the Fox Business host asked. “You said you’d maybe do more than just send in the MiG jets. Alright. What more?” Trump… (well, you try to suss out a coherent thought here). Well what I would do, is I would, we would, we have tremendous military capability and what we can do without planes, to be honest with you, without 44-year-old jets, what we can do is enormous, and we should be doing it and we should be helping them to survive and they’re doing an amazing job. Actually, it got worse. At one point, Trump suggested that as president he would threaten Russia with nuclear submarines. “You should say: ‘Look, you mention that word one more time and we’re gonna send [submarines] over and we’ll be coasting back and forth, up and down your coast’.”
What you don't get is Trump was ambiguous. No one knew what he would do and THAT was the beauty of it. Instead we have this fucking imbecile, this potato in chief that broadcast to the world what he isn't going to do. Biden is the biggest pile of dog shit ever.
Con man. His entire career is about being a con man. Fortunately for him there is no shortage of stupid people in this country.
trump is ALWAYS ambiguous on EVERY subject because he never knows what the fuck he's talking about. He's a con, and you're too stupid to see it.
Trump shows his utter ignorance every time he opens his mouth. Now if you’d said he was deliberately seeming stupid to gull the democrats and Putin you might have had a point…..nah he’s too fucking stupid to come in out of the rain.
You see, shane0911 was FORCED to say trump was being deliberately "ambiguous" because he's desperate for an excuse. It doesn't even make fucking sense. WHY would trump be "ambiguous"? How does that help the USA or our allies? What was wrong with a nice, firm "you attack us or our allies or you will have hell to pay. We stand on the side of democracies and not dictatorships"? And how was kissing Putin's ass, making a fool of himself at Helsinki while sucking Putin's dick, looking the other way while Putin put bounties on our soldiers, attempting to weaken NATO, hiring Putin's allies (Flynn and Manafort, etc.) into high levels of our government... etc. being "ambiguous"? There was NOTHING ambigous about it.... trump was and is a Russian asset.
