I posted this on the other thread .... THIS is what truly threatens those with opposing thoughts ... UPDATE: LAWLESS US -- Supreme Court REFUSES to Consider GOP Post-Election Fraud Cases Before Biden Inauguration (thegatewaypundit.com) The Body that is SUPPOSED to protect the Constitution will not listen to grievances. There can be no justice if the justice branch of the government won't hear cases.
United as what? Mindless obedient automatons? That's exactly the kind of united that the radical left and big tech want us to be. You can have it.
Really not sure what your point is, but I was merely pointing out what is, what has been lost, and a willingness to have that back. Not sure if you got that or not.
A politician, or private citizen for that matter, asking a private company to ban an individual is only that....a request. It is, in no way, the government limiting free speech. What does the First Amendment say? Let me help you... Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I suppose you have proof of this threat? In fact, it's been Trump who has been trying to do away with section 230 that protects social media from lawsuits over things just like this.
Do you have proof of the threat you mentioned? You ignored that question. Trump dislikes section 230 because he believes that they discriminate against conservatives and wants to get rid of it altogether. Dems want to reform it, not repeal it. Big difference.
