Exactly. I disagreed with some decisions, but I have not said that the Court itself had no constitutional right to make decisions.
Nowhere. Does that make all marriage unconstitutional? Of course not. The court is there to interpret the Constitution and they ruled that...
You are the one disagreeing here for that very reason! YOU!
Look, it is their friggin' job to make decisions. This requires them to have an opinion. They know the Constitution very well. If you want to make...
63%. And growing. Look it up.
What a shock! How would you change it? Robotic judges? Vulcans?
It means "jiggery-pokey and pure applesauce", perhaps. This is an lame argument even for you. A justice is free to speak his mind and he can say...
Like I say, you don't understand how the Supreme Court works. You just disagree with them. Tough shit.
Has she been charged with a crime? Nothing to "admit".
Well then, let's look at Scalia's response to the majority decision on Obamacare . . . "The Court's next bit of interpretive jiggery-pokery...
Get real. All you have to do is write a will to leave your possessions to whoever you wish.
Ignorance of how the Supreme Court works is not my problem.
Oh this is a new one. Obamacare is going to crash our economy? How does that work?
Like I said . . . when she gets charged with a crime, we can discuss it. Well, If I have an undying love for hillary then you are slobbing 16...
Clearly the wicked Trojans put stick-um on their face masks. :D Perhaps a violation that requires slow-motion to even see would be considered...
No, you were saying that "she should be on trial". That requires a crime. Call back when there is one.
Yes, I am so lame. Especially when you don't like my questions. I find it amusing that you think there are certain words that justices "shouldn't...
Who is closing their eyes? Who is alleging a crime?
two linemen. And you don't have to go to super slo-mo to see it. [MEDIA]
What has she been charged with?
